I thought perhaps many people here in Peru are not aware how easy it is to review minutes from committees and council meetings all easily accessible through the city of Peru web site. Take a few minutes to see what your aldermen are discussing.
This blog is maintained for the sole purpose of allowing the people of Peru and those interested in the cities of the Illinois Valley to express their views.
I thought perhaps many people here in Peru are not aware how easy it is to review minutes from committees and council meetings all easily accessible through the city of Peru web site. Take a few minutes to see what your aldermen are discussing.
Our aldermen specifically Ald. Ankiewicz is very much in favor of this proposed bus to bring shoppers to Peru if they wish to shop. I do agree with the article that we need to make sure it is a lasting project and not just while grant money is available. If you are using Firefox as a browser, you will receive a warning so either use a different browser or choose to ignore. After I was warned about this possiblity and finding out it was only Firefox with the problem, I choose to ignore.
A Merry Christmas and a Blessed New Year to all. Please be careful walking or driving in all this "White Christmas"
I chose to ask several questions during the public comment part of the City Council meeting. I directed my questions to Ald. Mikyska and after informing him that I had read the bylaws of the service, I asked who wrote them. The City Atty. took over the question saying it is possible that he had written them. Those of you who have read the bylaws are having a hard time believing that as am I.
Question 2. Is the $4000 per mo. from Peru to PVAS, a donation, a subsidy or a contractual obligation? No definite answer was given.
On Monday evening an ordinance will be passed providing the continued funding for another year unless someone objects and I can't see that happening.
Should the aldermen be looking at a different structure? Most definitely and unless they do, we may find ourselves asking LaSalle if they will also serve Peru? Irony, yes, but it is possible.
Ward 1
Incumbent Jamey Mertel (8yrs) will be opposed by Mike Radtke
Ward 2
No incumbent - Jack O'Beirne retires after 24 years
Those running for this seat: are Rodney Perez, Bob Borostowski, Jim Hurst
Ward 3: Incumbent Dave Waldorf (4 years) opposed by Mary Landsiedel
and Joe Witczak
Ward 4: Incumbent Dave Potthoff (20 years) will be opposed by Steve Weberski
I know that the Peru CSO puts up the decorations with the assist of the city electric trucks but my question is who is responsible for buying them. How old are the current ones and how often should they be replaced. If the CSO does pay for the purchase of Christmas decorations, I have a suggestion for them. Instead of blowing up so much money with fireworks on July 4, save some of the money and purchase new lights for Route 6 business districts.
July fireworks are gone in the blink of an eye but the Christmas decorations are up for at least 6 weeks. Many homes in Peru look fantastic with their brilliant light displays but downtown is another story. We drove west on 7th street and the homes toward the west end look super nice. I know there is not a lot of spare money but surely we can do better than this years Christmas display.
If you know of a particular street in Peru that looks very Christmasy, please share with us.
Now we all have to understand the very strange manner in which the ambulance service is run since the Board of Directors have total control and if needed they can appoint a new member of the Board without any need to get approval of anyone else. That will happen when one of them retires from office. At present the Board consists of the "old guard" of Ankiewicz, Mikyska and O'Bierne and since O'Bierne will be leaving the city council in April when a new alderman will be elected from his ward, they will need to select a friend of theirs in his place. This new member does not need to bring anything to the Board other than to be an elected official, no other qualifications needed and of course to be in agreement with those already there.
OK so now the Mayor is asking for a financial report and I could almost see the hairs on Ald. Ankiewicz's head stand up or perhaps it was on his chin. How dare the Mayor ask for that information even though the city gives the ambulance service 4000 per month with no questions asked. This very strange setup was established during the tenure of former Mayor Baker and in MHO, was done to keep a strangle hold on information to the public. Instead of looking for a number of well qualified people in the financial and medical community, it became a buddy system where no information other than the monthly number of calls from Peru LaSalle Peru Twp and Dimmick was made public.
If anything needs a breath of fresh air, it is PVAS.
My sources tell me that the PW Dept. paid for their own Christmas Party which they have every right to do. They also have a right to gather in a place of their choosing without a public expose'
Has being employed by the city now put the workers into a position that even when not working they must only meet behind locked doors? The Christmas Season is often celebrated with "good cheer" when people get together and should this have been any different. Last year we complained that the city did not need to spend large sums of money to entertain their well paid employees, so it looks like this year they took the citizens disapproval into consideration and did not sponsor the annual Christmas Party but that did not and should not prevent employees from paying for their own party.
On the flip side, there have been complaints about city workers not working as well as they should or as hard as they should and if you have a complaint please lodge it with the proper authorities, The Mayor of Peru. Please keep in mind they he may not know or see what you do, so let him know. But remember to disassociate the Christmas Party with the other unrelated work ethics problems. These are not new problems but ones that have existed for many years and old habits die hard.
In this situation (the public works Christmas Party) personal dislike by a few individuals has led to hatred and an attempt to disparage the Mayor in any way possible and particularly his membership in Union 150. I would like think that most people in Peru think for themselves and will not be influenced by hearsay and gossip.
Interesting idea I found while browsing on the computer. It looks like it is meant to encourage the small business owner. Maybe a good idea.
If they w0uld do this, it would save the city at least $1520 a month or 18, 240 per year if my math is correct. Take that saved money and put it in the "pool fund", show the people you are ready to sincerely make an effort to save money and at the same time work toward really saving some money to help reduce our debt and building up savings for the pool that they believe we need.
The grant request will be sent in without the signature of Mayor Harl. It is uncertain as to whom will be the authorized signature on the form. Ald. Ankiewicz and Wren both said they would sign it but my question is who determines who has the authority to sign the grant request. Does a legal paper need to be signed to give them the authority? I asked the City Attorney and he replied that he knew nothing about it. Ald. Waldorf had said last week that it was his understanding from IDNR that the paper would not bear much weight without the signature of the Mayor.
The News Trib will certainly have more in depth coverage of citizen comments.
Fiscally responsible our City Council is not. Keep in mind it was last spring when the council refused to accept the offer made to purchase the gen sets because former Mayor Baker said they were worth more and so we spent more money on rechecking them and received less from the same company who initally offered more. Then we just spent 15,000 to Williams Aquatics to determine the pool was out of code and not worth repairing and then we spent $3000 to Chamlin for one meeting of the Bike Path Committee and a couple of possible paths mapped out. Another 3000 to NCIC to write up the requestfor the pool grant and $6000 to Chamlin to apply for the Tiger 2 grant for our roads which we did not get. Now another 5 to 7 thousand to Williams for further plans for the IDNR. Do the math. It must be easy to spend the taxpayers bucks.
Also a Motion to donate $500 to the Illinois Valley Fine Arts Trust.
I attended last weeks finance meeting and don't recall either of those topics being approved to come before the council on Monday evening. Isn't that the purpose of having finance meetings to approve items that the full council needs to vote upon.
I think the Peru residents need to find out their legal standing regarding whether or not they are obligated to pay the extra money. Can we declare it is a hardship and maybe the Peru Twp. can pay our portion? As is stands today, I have no inention of paying the unnecessary fee.
Will someone please inform us what the Illinois Valley Fine Arts Trust is and why we are donating that large sum of money to them?
My family and most families I know have to live within a budget. Why doesn't the city of Peru? City debt is basically the same as earlier posted but yet the city continues to ignore that and when money is wanted, what do they do but add another fee onto the overburdoned taxpayer.
All went smoothly initially, routine business was discussed and the council unanimously overruled the veto of the Mayor regarding the Parc grant application. They were assured by the city atty and city clerk that they did not need to provide proof that the city had funding to meet the requirements set forth by the DNR on their application grant in spite of the fact that the application clearly states the opposite.
Perhaps a class in Reading 101 and Finance is in order for all. Particularly for members of the council who also sit on the Finance Committee as Ald. Mertel, Ankiewicz and Mikyska. It seems to me that those 3 aldermen should be very aware of the finances of the city, right? Wrong, Ald. Mertel thinks we have enough money to be able to honestly apply for the grant and says so in response to a citizen question.
The same question is given to the Treasurer to verify what Ald. Mertel has just said about ample funds being available. His answer was a simple negative shaking of his head. One very classic moment that had to impress upon all, the seriousness of the finances of the city and Alderman Mertal is not aware of it.
Ald. Ankiewicz thinks we will have "dead babies" if we do not have a pool built. Do you think he knows they give swimming lessons at the YMCA here in Peru?
These are all educated men on the city council and yet they continue to be irrational in their voting decisions. What gives? If they cannot govern in a manner that is best for all the residents, perhaps it is time to not run again as they give no honor or respect to the office they are holding. They are making a mockery of our city for all to see.
For all those at Mike's tonight, it is time to stop and get real and rational. We who are the unwanted watchers know all of this is not even about the pool.
His objection to this resolution is as follows:
Failure to implement and pass ordinance to certify and acknowledge that the City of Peru has 100 percent of the funds necessary to fulfill the qualifications of this resolutions as required by the State of Illinois........
...In closing I am not against filing for a grant for the public swimming pool, however, I choose to be fiscally responsible for the benefit of the city's future generations.
The council of 7 men voted to have the resolution put on the agenda for the next meeting to overide the Mayor's veto and the motion was brought up by Ald. Jamie Mertel of the 1st Ward.
After the meeting, I asked Ald. Potthoff and Ferrari as to who would sign the DNR request and also asked Atty Schweickert and none of them could give me an answer. The Atty said in 30 years as City Atty serving Peru, he has never encountered this.
I came home and went into the DNR web site and found their rules for applying for grant assistance and in black and white number 7 states "A signed document by the applicant verifying the applicant has the resources to initially finance and subsequently manage the project area and will comply with program regulations and indemnify the Department from any liability relative to the project and 8. a schedule of proposed expenditures/reimbursements from anticipated start through project completion.
Either someone is not reading the rules of the DNR or is just trying to make a political statement which is not adding to any credibility the members may have had.
When you ignore the rules for applying for a grant by ignoring the rules the department has set up to apply for a grant, is this rather like fraud. To knowingly submit an application with NO MONEY to fulfill the necessary obligation, how does that make you look and how does it make the city of Peru look. Not too bright in MHO anyway.
Tell me where I am wrong. And who is going to sign the PARC grant application since the Mayor will not for the above given reasons and it requires a signature.Would one of the members of the council be willing to put their name on the dotted line and accept financial responsiblity?
Ald. Mikyska is so obsessed with the image of Peru, it is hard to understand. He believes that someone will not move to our town because we lack a swimming pool and our IMAGE will be severely damaged. His suggestion for money was to add $5.00 to your utility bill each month until we have the cash.
Personally I believe that the pool went down under their watch and now we are the only Illinois Valley town to be without a pool and that is what people will remember them for. Peru has so many other problems that the pool is miniscule in comparison.
When I commented to the council that $5.00 each month could hurt those who are on a fixed income and those who are unemployed and already having difficulties, I was rudely interrupted by Ald. Potthoff telling me that they had done nothing yet regarding the increase. Sorry to tell you Dave that I sat through the whole meeting and I was well aware of what was taking place. This is the Alderman who always professes to be watching out for the residents. I guess he believes that 5.00 a month is a pittance. To him it may be but let me remind him that 5.00 might very well be the cost of a prescription or a meal.
It looks like the property tax will need to be raised to be able to continue to contribute in the needed amounts to the police pension fund. To be announced later.
Tonight after watching this performance, I could only be thankful that there will be an election in about 6 months.