“It doesn’t take a majority to win, just a tireless minority that will keep starting brush fires in the mind and hearts of their fellow men.”

Samuel Adams

Tuesday, December 23, 2014

Merry Christmas to My Friends and Fellow Bloggers Everywhere

123 comments:

LINDA said...

MERRY XMAS TO ONE AND ALL AND A SPECIAL ONE TO LOIS AND BOB. (P.S. The caps are not because I'm angry. They're because I'm shouting merry xmas)

Anonymous said...

Let's hope the New Year will bring new faces to the 3rd and 4th wards of the Peru city council. Peru is in desperate need of common sense governing in order to break out of the purely political motivations that have a stranglehold hold every decision being made right now. Let's all pray for more honest and moral leadership in Peru. Blessings to all who continue to fight the good and righteous fight in Peru.
We will prevail.

Anonymous said...

Merry Christmas! What I find pathetic is when there is a simple holiday greeting or a post praising an event, there are few posts. Oh, but complain about someone not putting up Christmas lights? Look out, they will all stumble over one another to make a snotty remark.

Anonymous said...

2:44 pm Curch history calls for strict discipline between church and government, Being that most bloggers have grown up during times of this highly enforced discipline you will find very few comments interchanginging the two.
As for Christmas decorations and lights I find no comparison and will leave usch a small decision as to whether to or not to to each individual although I enjoy them. No, I did not do any outdoors decorations.

Anonymous said...

If the alderman at large initiative would have passed, there would have been races in all 4 wards. First ward shows no interest from the last two elections of having no contested races.

Peru Town Forum said...

8:08 PM

That is exacty the reason it was put up for passage and the currently seated aldermen opposed it with the help of former mayor Baker The first and third ward will most likely be that way for some time to come, without a great deal of public interest in running for office. The public is very fortunate to see someone opposing Waldorf in the third and it is going to be interesting to see if the people in the third are really interested in change by voting against the incumbent.

Anonymous said...

9:27, I agree, but mostly my point was that anytime there is a positive post about anything, there are little to no comments.

Anonymous said...

Damn shame we do not elect at least half of the aldermen at-large. Even more shameful is the fact that the 1st ward has only one candidate and that candidate has already proven to be a follower of the status quo with no independent thought or initiative.
For Mueller to go unchallenged is truly a disgrace and embarrassment to all the residents of that ward.

Anonymous said...

2:44 - what church are you talking about? Every religion I know of tries to influence government. Particularly the Catholic Church as of late.

Anonymous said...

Just read in the NT that the Peru Recreation Commission purchased a parade float. Isn't the rec board funded by property taxes? What a waste!

Anonymous said...

We were told the at large scheme wasn't about any individuals, only about the best interests of Peru. Now we see one of the key schemers is running for office. Laughable!

Anonymous said...

The traditional 2 aldermen/ward is a highly disciplined easily controlled process. The innovative 1 aldermen/ward 2 alderman at large had the promise of a much more open government with fresh ideas. To even consider that through the reduction of aldermen you would have less representation was foolish.
Yes we need 8 aldermen to reach the mandatory 7-1 tally, but doesn't a 5-1 tally produce he same results.
There are many qualified but getting them to run is a problem which must be addressed. Thankfully the 3d ward has Mr. Nelson who would give Peru a new face in the political ring and a open positive and most of all fair outlook.
The continued demize of the 1st ward representation has proven to be the Archiles Heal of Peru government. This being a off year election It would be positive move to see Peru's former Mayor of 44 years run for 1st Ward Aldermen and than decide on future political positions 2 years later. I'd vote for him two times even though I don't live in the ward.

Anonymous said...

We don't need Aldermen at all. IF we switch to the Council Manager form of government - through a public vote - we can also adopt the Commission form with all commissioners selected by the entire city.
The Aldermanic form makes no sense for a city the size of Peru.

Anonymous said...

1:56 Two words, scheme and schemers, downgrade your comment. The person who you claim has created a laughable situation is definetly recieving my vote. He supported the at large policy and has stayed active politically since its defeat. I believe he will understand the free enterprize system and how it is to be applied in government. Preseently the incumbent 3rd ward alderman does not.

Anonymous said...

I have but 2 comments with regards to Monday, Dec. 29th's council meetings.
1. Why call them "committee as a whole meetings"? Call them what they are "CLOSED SESSIONS". Public not invited.
2. We just purchased a street sweeper for $200,000 plus and now we're going to purchase a vac truck for $400,000. Where are we getting the money?

Anonymous said...

Waldorf must be going to be at Monday's meeting because the mowing contract is back on the agenda. The super majority, no bid, will get done this time with yes man Waldorf there.

Anonymous said...

In regards to the 8:04 comment about the money being spent on many recent purchases why in the world did we have to increase our sales tax for the roads? It seems as though money is not an issue so why penalize those who shop in Peru?

Anonymous said...

The at large push was most defintely a sheme. I will not apologize for calling a spade a spade. The question was on the ballot simply to get a former fourth ward candidate another shot at office by running citywide. Totally concocted and enacted for the benefit of one individual. Not to benefit the majority. And I will not apologize for naming the current third ward challenger as one of the plotters. Good luck if you vote for that. You will get what you deserve.

Anonymous said...

I will say it again the only people complaining are on this miserable blog site. The rest of the city is quite happy with the direction the city is moving. And because people are happy that is why very few are running for office. It has nothing to do with wards or at large or any of that crap.

Anonymous said...

Lois if you want 1st ward candidates to run why don't you run yourself? You seem to have all the answers and also you seem pretty confident the majority agrees with your views.

Anonymous said...

An "At-Large Initiative" which changes the system to 1 Alderman per Ward and 4 At-Large for a total of 8 would be the perfect solution to get more candidates interested in running. It's the perfect setup that allows for more representation for everyone and has something for everyone. A combination of ward aldermen and at-large aldermen opens up the entire city and will create much needed interest in local government. Peru's electorate is so disconnected and uninformed about who their elected officials are and what inept and unqualified elected officials they really are. The current ward system that allows aldermen to become entrenched for multiple terms is desingned to benefit only the encumbents who are there to make sure that nothing ever changes. Just like the current system in Peru. No-Bids, No Fairness, No Open Meetings, No qualified department heads, No public input, No accountability, No common sense, and only one alderman willing to stand up for honesty and integrity in government. We have a long way to go to achieve responsible government.

Anonymous said...

Alderman Perez has signs up in violation of city ordinance. He should be censored. Can you imagine if all 7 candidates put up signs already. He is making the city look bad. There is a reason there is a limit of when signs can go up. Even if permitted by federal law he should be ashamed and remove them at once.

Peru Town Forum said...

6:07 PM

I do believe political signs can be up for an unlimited time in Peru. Or this might be state law. Discussion has happened in previous elections.

Anonymous said...

Governor Pat Quinn, however, signed a law in 2011 barring municipalities from regulating when political signs can be displayed on residential property.

According to the Quinn administration, the new law, would bring Illinois into compliance with a 1994 U.S. Supreme Court ruling indicating that political signs are protected “free speech” under the U.S. Constitution’s First Amendment. Under the new law, municipalities can still regulate the size and number of political signs, as long as any such restrictions are “content neutral” and “reasonable.”

Anonymous said...

6:07 PM - You do not know the law. There is absolutely no restriction as to when political signs can be "put up." Yes, it is legal 365 days per year to have a sing in your yard - State, Federal, and Peru IL Laws are all in agreement on this. This has been the law for several years.
Additionally - I don't think you meant to use the word "censored." Everyone has a right to free speech - censorship Un-American. Maybe you meant to say "censured." I don't think the Peru Council has anything in their rules that allows them to censure a member. Regardless - a "censure" is a political move and has no bearing on law.

Anonymous said...

Nice try 6:07. You should know that Alderman Perez does his homework and is fully aware of the rules regarding political signs. He could have them out all year long, there are no restrictions on when signs can go up.

Anonymous said...

Ran through the Venture Drive intersection for a little fun yesterday. I love going through that intersection without stopping. Anyway, some guy thought he would be cute and stop in the middle of the road and make a 3-point turn around. Oh what fun! I scared the bejesus out of him by blasting my horn and revving my engine with the clutch engaged. I drive a big pickup and this guy was in a pipsqueak of a car - one of them little hybrids. He could probably park in the bed of my truck. Nothing like a lot of noise and a huge piece of machinery to scare them straight! I don't think that guy will be stopping for a three point turnaround in that intersection anymore.

Anonymous said...

An uneducated electorate, like Mr. or Ms. 6:07, is one of the greatest threat our Republic faces today. The only bigger threat are the headline surfers and the short sighted emotional liberals.
This is why I despise "get out the vote" programs. They attract the uneducated. The same goes for registering to vote on election day and the multitude of other registration schemes. Finally - college students should not be eligible to vote in their host community unless they have a verifiable off campus residence - not a FRAT House - but a real house or apartment with utilities. If these people want to vote, they need to vote with an absentee ballot in their own community - they should not be allowed to pollute and dilute the local representation.

Anonymous said...

11:23, What is "concocted" is your interpretation of the at-large movement. You can have it both ways with at-large. There will always be aldermanic elections every two years, at-large or not. The difference with at-large is the benefit of encouraging "more" candidates to run at-large when the sitting ward aldermen are so "entrenched" in office. The supporters of the movement made it absolutely clear why it was beneficial. You are claiming at-large was a conspiracy when the backers were crystal clear about why it would create a much more diverse and engaged electorate. Of course it would help get new people elected as aldermen on a regular basis. That's the benefit. The at-large movement is the most open and honest intitiative in Peru. Of course some of the supporters are former or future candidates for public office. There was no secret or conspiracy. The bottom line is at-large will improve government because it will encourage more candidates to run and more importantly it will help prevent aldermen from serving ridiculously extended tenures in office. Your judgement is clouded because you have personal animosity for certain supporters of at-large. You are blinded by the same fears that haunt the sitting aldermen who want stay office for decades who shutter at the thought of candidates who they know will challenge the status quo system in Peru. The truth is you should be afraid because eventually these candidates are going to break through by way of at-large or not. I don't blame you for being afraid of them.

Anonymous said...

I think 607s point is the appearance of the town with signs out so early. Rodney should set an example and wait until last 30 days for signs. I support him as a candidate but I think he is over the top putting his signs up so early. I am sure his opponent is actually happy about it though as this will cost Rodney some support.

Anonymous said...

If people who waste the time of others making up hypothecticals which are not taking place would stick to the realism of those who manupulate existing ordinances to their own interpretation such as defined parameters to eliminate open competitive bidding Aldermen Perez can continue to post his legal campaign signs doing no one any harm.
To elaborate upon the fact that a political candidate is first in posting campaign signs and discredit as such is not one step from supidity but is below supidity. Most incumbents in Peru dislike and disrespect Aldermen Perez, i.e. Mayor Harl referring to him as Mr. rather than Aldermen at a council meeting and stating that his own fellow aldermen don't respect him.
What the Mayor and his fellow incumbents fail to acknowledge is that their dislike of Aldermen Pereez does not rub off on the public voter. Most of which favor his representation, outspoken mannerisms equal and only representation of all. The ultimate question is not what Rod Perez has personally accomplished but what he has stopped from being manipulated to be accomplished in his time in office. When ones main critizism is that he is not on the same page as the rest of us we had best read all the pages before the next election and vote understanding word for word.

Anonymous said...

Anon 6:07 If campaign signs make the city look bad why not eliminate them altogether? There are plenty of other media devices.

Anonymous said...

What about Boss Harl's phony signs at road resurfacing projects... you remember, the signs that cost the tax payers $1,600 each and basically said "This road project was made possible by Mayor Scott Harl." At least Alderman Perez pays for his own signs. He doesn't fund them through taxes or get "donations" from people doing business with the City. Yes... old Boss Harl knows how to get things... by bilking the taxpayer and extorting contractors.

Peru Town Forum said...

10:57 AM

Speaking of things that make the city look bad, I wish to share something with you.We took a relative from out of town to see the Westclos display of lights and how it was so nice that it was in a public venue that could be seen be all driving by. I then explained that our city had spent $1600 for a Christmas tree which they then placed inside city hall. And they responded, well then only those working there get to see it (mostly) and then said How Selfish! This is the kind of stuff that makes the city look bad.

Anonymous said...

I think it's smart of Perez to put out signs now when the weather is decent. Better than trying to put signs out when the ground is frozen. At least Perez doesn't put two of his signs in one yard, which is against the rules. However that rule didn't stop your mayor from allowing two signs in one yard last election.

Anonymous said...

so Lois is all for political signs all over...OMG

Anonymous said...

Perez should run for Mayor in two years. He should start putting together a war chest to match Harl's.

Anonymous said...

Why would putting up campaign signs early cost Rod Perez votes? I just do not get it. Maybe he just had some time over the holidays to get it done. And by the way there is still a Rauner sign up in back of the McDonalds. Anyone have anything to say about that?

Anonymous said...

If being a observer of Peru Politics and the putting out signs is disturbing to you it would be best to take off the blinders and concentrate on the real city practices. Examples would be illegal city employee payrolls, multi million no bid contracts, complete disrepect of transparency to citizenship and inability to recognize the need of filling professional positions with the expertise necessary to create successful endeavors.
Multi tasking may be efficient in a garbage route but it is unheard of for a $50+ million dollar business, the business being the City of Peru.

Anonymous said...

11:26what are you talking about? No one is a bit happy with the city at all people are just discouraged and frustrated what good does it to complain no one listens or cares. I truly hope we get some new people in there to challenge those so called aldermen

Anonymous said...

To Rodney's defense I saw on his Facebook site his son was making signs which I thought were very cool looking so I messaged him and asked if he was my alderman and he said no that I'm in first ward east of Marquette Rd. I told Rodney if he can I would still like to support him and have a sign. I told him to put one in my yard while the ground was soft. It's my yard if I want his sign there all year I should have that right. I also know this current administration mainly Mayor S Harl recruited Rodney's opponent that I know for a fact. I assure all of you Rodney's opponent will not run again after he loses at this next election. He's only running against Rodney because of Harl.
Whoever said Rodney would lose voted for putting signs out early need to understand Rodney never had those votes in the first place. For all he does for Peru and our children I highly doubt he will lose a vote because he put a sign out early. Besides, it's the homeowners who must want the signs and want Rodney elected again.
Go Rodney Go

Anonymous said...

Christmas is over. time to take down the lights and relieve the strain on the power grid.

As we enter the new year, everyone should become more conscious of the energy we use. I'm not a tree hugger by any means, I just don't like waste. The latest energy use study conducted by the US DOE revealed that 58% of ALL energy produced in the United States is wasted - i.e. it was used for no useful purpose; it didn't heat anything, it didn't move anything, it didn't accomplish anything - it was just used. Most of this is due to unnecessary lighting, televisions remaining on all the time, radios remaining on all the time, low efficiency transformer power supplies, etc. etc. etc.
I count Christmas Lights in this batch of wasteful uses of electricity.
By wasting electricity - demand is increased artificially which increases the cost. So by wasting electricity we pay more in two ways. We pay more because we buy more AND we pay more because the utility raises the rates due to supply and demand.
So take down your lights this weekend - or leave them up but don't turn them on. Every kilowatt you save is money in the bank!

Anonymous said...

Peru has a ordinance for political signs and that is 40 days prior to the election. The Federal law overrides the city ordinance. The fact that Perez will intentionally laugh at the city ordinance that he voted for is what bothers most people. Peru officials should respect the laws, even if it applies to them. ITS ALL ABOUT LOOK AT ME is the message Perez sends.

Anonymous said...

Who is our city's sign chief? Yes, we like "chief" titles. Job description?

Anonymous said...

8:27, I totally disagree with you on your assessment that the city isn't happy with the way it's run, it's a small group that isn't happy, the greater community is happy otherwise this council and mayor wouldn't be in office. Outside of Perez the candidates that are part of your group keep getting beat, that should tell you something, I will bet after the 2015 election everything will be the same.

Anonymous said...

The County Board is meeting today to raise our taxes. This meeting is in violation of the Open Meetings Act - no agenda has been posted. It sounds like Mr. Hicks wants to get the tax increase done before the new board is seated - to avoid explaining why budgets have not been adjusted over the past several years in anticipation of the property assessment decreases from the recession which are finally starting to hit home.
Next election we need to get rid of Hicks altogether and get rid of the other Dems on the board - including the Peru contingent of tax and spenders Jill Bernal and Joseph Oscepinski.

Anonymous said...

Who would have ever thought that Peru would be represented by a group of men who every time they meet they propose to spend at least a half a million dollars. Big time financial expenditures, fire trucks, Vactor trucks, streetsweepers, airport costs, write off of concert expense debts staged at the airport, unbelievable administrative costs for unqualified personnel and on and on and on.
BUT YET NEVER A WORD OF HIRING A CITY MANAGER OR OUTSIDE SOURCES FOR TRUE PROFESSIONAL ADVISE.

Anonymous said...

9:56 They would have to know the issues before they can vote to support the residents. I have never before seen such a disconnected group that vote the party ticket without a individual opinion. Its the same story--nobody runs and they maintain the party status. Remember that you need no qualifications to run. That's evident to all of us.

Anonymous said...

the new board is seated and has been since the beginning of December

Anonymous said...

Anyone who puts up signs this early is only doing so because they have an obsessive need to see their name in bold print. That type of person is also probably all over social media. And probably would try to get their name in the paper weekly. You see that type of person is only doing the things they do to satisfy their own mental complex about fame. Kind of like a Kardashian. And the uneducated electorate doesn't see it, they are easily fooled by these ego maniacs and the good show they put on. But trust me, mark my words, a person like Rodney Perez is all about himself in the end.

Anonymous said...

7:25 am Your reasoning on voting for a candidate tells us all what you expect. A nice sign and a facebook posting. His opponent may have a different agenda? You would like everybody to think that Mayor HARL has hand picked candidates, that wouldn't be the case. And that wouldn't be the strategy that would work.

Anonymous said...

9:19 - you are wrong. The sign ordinance was revised to match the state law a couple of years ago. The reason it was changed was to remove the prohibition on when signs could be posted.

Anonymous said...

that seems odd 10:18, but ok. They still need to post an agenda and we still need to vote out the Dems in the Peru contingent.

Anonymous said...

If the new opponent becomes the new alderman, at least abstaining from voting won't be an issue. Hopefully the opponent is smart and honest enough to see how this administration has not had transparency on many levels. Maybe we will eventually see the qualifications and education of those who Harl has appointed for positions in our city. Totally floors me how nobody has answered this? Better yet, who questioned this? But always remember who is friends with who? And who's in the club or waiting outside the door to become a member. True?

Anonymous said...

anon 10:43 perhaps you should read 7:25 comment again. Didn't he or she say the support for Alderman Perez was because of all he has done for the city and children?
You may need to take off your blinders and read comments with an open mind unless you've been drinking from the Harl Koolaid stand too. I work at Carus with some very close affiliates of Scottie. Alderman Perez' opponent was indeed hand-picked. He was actually Harls second choice but since Biederstedt chose not to run against him they convinced this other guy who I don't even know his name. Alderman Perez s very well liked outside the boys club circle.

Anonymous said...

10:06
What! take the cash away from Bernie!

Anonymous said...

Hmmmmmm.... Insurance salesman is challenging Perez. Interesting. Something tells me the city policies are in play.

Anonymous said...

Rodney is all about publicity. Which is why you see the signs already. Like the FBI investigation. What ever happened with that anyway? Nothing happened other than Rodney got to have his name in the paper and feel important. I prefer to see results and Rodney has no results in 4 years. I don't think I could find one thing he's accomplished other than gaining a fan base on Facebook more appropriate for professional wrestling than serious public service.

Anonymous said...

11:44 hahahah Close affiliates with Carus? Let's get to the point and let us decide based on qualifications. Nobody will get elected because of a Mayor endorsement. I guess the comments about Perez's challenger will continue for the next several months. Yes, he sells insurance and possibly a college graduate. And your point is that a truck driver has more qualifications than a insurance salesman?

Anonymous said...

This Tom Payton character who is challenging Alderman Perez is the "establishment candidate" who was recruited by Harl and the other aldermen who can't stand having an alderman amongst them with ethics and integrity. Those two qualities of character are non-existent in the establishment aldermen and are not tolerated by the powerbrokers who control the flow of cash and commerce to the chosen companies and individuals in Peru. Chamlin's, TEST, Michelini, aka Illinois Valley Excavating, Debo's, River Valley Insurance, Don Baker, the CSO, and all the other flunkeys and meat-heads that stumble in and out of Ankiewicz's place will always work against any alderman or aldermanic candidate that supports open bidding, free-market ideals, honest business practices, and qualified and competent department heads. The City of Peru way of doing business is based solely and completely on political connections, political appointments, and political campaign contributions. No business is ever conducted based on what is best for the community as a whole. All decisions are based on who will benefit financially or who will gain politically. Peru's city government and the great majority of its elected officials are simply morally and ethically corrupted by the system established over years and years of manipulation and political wrangling by Don Baker and now Scott Harl who has actually taken the corruption, the dirty campaign money, and the secrecy to new levels. Just take a look at how the Peru establishment and the lackey aldermen treat Alderman Perez. Whenever Mr. Perez speaks out for fairnes and honest government the others become absolutely incensed at the thought. Tom Payton is just one in a long line of stooge establishment candidates who, if elected, will fall in line faster than it takes to hold one of those phony "Committee of the Whole" meetings. Feww things around the Illionois Valley are more predictable than Peru politics. The problem the power-brokers have is the fact that Rodney is far more popular than they give him credit for. How ironic it is that Joe Citizen in Peru really hopes for one essential quality from its elected officials. That being Honesty. At the same time honesty is actually the only quality that will disqualify a Peru establishment candidate. How sad and twisted this city has become at the hands of the Profiteers and Political Hacks disguised as mayor, aldermen, and appointed officials.

Anonymous said...

2:19 I would imagine that candidate Tom Payton has expected that a few will move to discredit his campaign. I guess you want to believe that Harl and Don Baker get together to list the preferred candidates. It always is those who offer so little have something to say about those who truly want to help Peru. Lets judge Mr. Payton on his qualifications and reasons to run not because he is running against Rodney Perez.

Anonymous said...

I'll take a Truck Driver over a "college graduate" Insurance Salesman six days a week and twice on Sunday.
But, one must take into consideration that insurance salesmen don’t lie… they just don’t know what the truth is!

Anonymous said...

Is Chico Perez Alderman Perez's father? I'm voting for him in the 4th Ward! No matter - 2 x Perez on the council is better than an any five Boss Harl Candidates.

Anonymous said...

Everyone will need to check Boss Harl's campaign disclosure report in April. It won't be filed until after the election - but you might be able to gleam a bit on knowledge on which Aldermen he supported.
Everyone knows that all the Sappy signs where paid for by the Harl Fund. We will see who he buys this election.

Anonymous said...

Now I'm curious about the insurance mans true agenda to run all the sudden. Lois should be able to answer, has he been attending meetings prior to this election? Did he express interest for alderman in prior elections or is this election a "special interest" for him? I smell a pig, and a new prospective member to the boys club. I believe Perez has done a fine job for us and is a true advocate for all citizens and not just those in his district.
He obviously rattles cages and we all know that the mayor would discreetly find someone to run against Perez in hopes of a defeat and win for the mayor. I don't see Perez having a problem winning the next election. It's only obvious the insurance guy was hand picked. Why else would one run against a person for the people.

Anonymous said...

This blog was absolutely certain Mike Hart was going to win. And Steve Weberski (twice). And Sherry Mayszak. And the at large referendum would pass. And now Rodney Perez...

Anonymous said...

Anon 2:19 I am disregarding your foregone already drawn conclusions of Mr. Tom Payton and his term as aldermen because you nor I have any special insight of the future.
I, as you regard Alderman Perez as a real stand up guy with a overabundance of honesty as I believe Mr. Payton woud exhibit if elected.
As for the body of the rest of your comment in reference to the Mayor, city council, elected and appointed city officials I find nothing to disagree about with you.

Lois said...

This blog has never ever said that any one would positively win and it has favored others for mayor and the fiasco that happened in the last 4th ward election would knock the socks off of most people in town, if they knew what really happened.

Anonymous said...

A lot of people's socks would be knocked off if they knew the truth about a certain person downtown at city hall. He or she who seeks the truth shall find. Eventually.

Anonymous said...

Just heard two more 20+ young persons who grew up in the illinois valley have moved to Chicago. Yep, they keep leaving. Some people can be big fish in a little pond staying here. What does this area really have to offer our youth?

Anonymous said...

If Tom Payton was truly interested in becoming an alderman, he would have been attending council meetings long before taking out a petition. Payton was hand picked by Harl. He was seen in the mayor's office twice before taking out a petition. If he was truly interested in being an alderman, he would attend council meetings now but guess what, he only rarely shows up. He's another Jim Giordano.

Anonymous said...

9:10 I agree with you 100%.

Anonymous said...

The vactor truck is all on Waldorf that was his 500,000 purchase and now venture dr. Of course waldorf and the old guys on council don't need to be worried they are going to be passing a steaming pile of poo to the younger generations in our city...we don't have endless stream of cash coming in....we will be broke in 5 to 7 years. But I hav spoke to he challenger in the 3rd ward at my door. Very sharp business and leader skills will insight on how he sees Peru 10 years from now if you stick w waldor and 10 years if you vote for him....waldorf will not have a chance if he brings it out during campaign

He shows the holes and pitfalls the council is leading us to today...

Anonymous said...

11:44 am - I can verify that what you said about Biederstedt being the mayor's first choice is true. I got that straight from Biederstedt himself. Payton has no idea what he's in for with a race against Perez.

Anonymous said...

I hope the Peru city street workers like the new vactor truck Waldorf wanted so much. According to Michelini, it's a dirty job. I know our guys are used to dirty jobs, but Waldorf and Ferrari insist they use this machine every single day! Remember that come election time. The only nay vote was Perez.

Anonymous said...

We need to outsource all of the Public Works Department.

Anonymous said...

I'm curious to know what the Mayor's reaction to the Vactor truck purchase was. The NT reported a certain business spoke out against the purchase in an attempt to have the city continue to use his services.
This business is a heavy contributor to the Mayor's campaign fund. $200 5/25/2011, $350 5/2/2012, $500 6/22/2013, $500 6/7/2014. There was no increase in the 2014 contribution..... hmmmmmm. Maybe the Mayor did not like that. Or was the Mayor lobbying NOT to purchase the Vactor Truck? Was anyone present to see exactly what happened?

Anonymous said...

5:27, what do you mean what really happened,what happened was the people voted for the candidate that they wanted, the losing candidate in his first lost race started bullying people whom he thought changed their vote, he was extreme and part of a fringe group we did 't care for, we didn't forget it the second time around.

Anonymous said...

9:39, What really happened in that the Boss selected a new Yes man to run and dumped his old campaign supporter / manager. To further confuse the issue, I personally believe he duped the other candidate into running - further diluting the vote - just like he did the last time he ran for Mayor.

Anonymous said...

the mayor showed his colors during that race, no integrity then no integrty now, an embarassmnt.

Anonymous said...

Some real imagination out here today. The third candidate in the fourth ward was not a factor in the last election. The winner had enough to beat both of them combined.

Anonymous said...

6:54AM- I'm glad at least two aldermen want to see our employees working. Although to be fair I'm sure the employees are happy that Rodney tried to protect them from having to do a "dirty job" as you call it.

Anonymous said...

And no manners either. At the meeting last night, a man was recognized for heroic efforts in putting out a fire in a wheelchair bound woman's home. Chief King made the presentation to the man, but Harl made no effort to shake the man's hand, no pat on the back, nothing! Disgraceful!

Anonymous said...

Nothing will change in Peru until the "average" voter starts paying attention and researches the candidates at election time. As it stands now - maybe 25% of the voters actually know anything about the goings on in Peru and how their particular Alderman votes. This blog, such as it is, is the only conduit of information short of calling each elected official every week and questioning them. Our newspaper does not dig into the issues - they simply regurgitate what was discussed at the council meeting - they never go to committee meetings.
So we have apathetic voters - for the most part - and an unconcerned news media. The way the voters decide on who to vote for is name recognition which is accomplished, primarily, with yard signs. I'd be willing to bet that if somebody littered the town with signs for a fictitious candidate it would pull in a substantial number of votes write in votes.
So People of Peru - you get what you deserve. If you want something different, pay attention and tell the newspaper that you want detailed reports of all meetings - including committee meetings, library board meetings, etc. or else you will drop your subscription. Demand investigative reports and real information - not just feel good crap that they usually print. Not once has the newspaper reported on the Mayors contributors. The way he collects money is in keeping with Chicago - not a small town!

Anonymous said...

Radio said the New finance guy said the new vac truck will pay for itself within 5 years? Who filled his boots with crap! Would be nice to know how he figured the numbers.
Did he include wages, insurance, fuel, maintenance? The truck is over 400,000.00
Does this also mean they will no longer contract with Michelini? This is another duping us taxpayers situation. Like the hiring of a city engineer but still paying heafty Chamlin fees.
I had a conversation with chief Doug B. about fixing pot holes on my street because my alderman never returned my calls. The first time I questioned Doug he said we are short handed and would put me on a list. Month later he said I'm at the top of the list three weeks after that he said to many water breaks and guys are back logged. Do we have the extra manpower to run that thing? Or will this be the next reason for hiring more of his friends? The new finance guy better watch himself with these Clowns because when this city ship sinks they will all turn their back on him like they did to Mikos. If Alderman Perez was the only no vote then I'm ashamed of my alderman Potthoff. He should know better.

Anonymous said...

@ 10:51 a.m. Are you insinuating that the city employees don't work hard? Do you actually have a clue what they do? There is not enough manpower to run that vactor truck, especially not every day. The city will have to hire somebody, so what they say they will be saving, is not true, but nobody will remember that.

Anonymous said...

We should be outsourcing more not taking on additional tasks. My prediction, the Vactor truck will sit idle six months after we get it. Remember the hot tar machine that the city boys where supposed to use to fix cracks and such in the pavement.... well, that essentially brand new machine was on the auction list. Apparently nobody on the staff knew how or wanted to use it.

Anonymous said...

I see there is another banner advertisement on the NT web page for the City of Peru. "Need a Calendar for the New Year? Get them here!" it says.

Why do we need to pay to advertise this? Come to think of it, whey are we giving away calendars? Waste, Waste, Waste.

Anonymous said...

Why would a business that has to pay for a storage garage for its equipment continue to invest in more? Doesn't the new finance guy realize that Peru can't protect its dump trucks as well as a half million dollar Vactor Truck. Will this Vactor have a GPS in it so that it does not get lost in the Hennepin grasslands? To those in question of why Bernabei did not submit lawncare with his friends, D&M of Spring Valley to a competitive bid the answer has been proven. He was not forced to and he didn't want to. The year,2014, has been a disaster for Peru and before I get the MOVE answer I'll tell you that I am going to. I'll also inform you that Peru is losing a better citizen than it is keeping in one particular situation. I believe in sharing the wealth rather than the greedy philosophy of one controls and recieves ALL.
Peru is the only city I know of that did not have a living Nativity Scene this Christmas. When questioned I was told that they could not find three Wise Men in the entire City.

Anonymous said...

The "Finance Boy" has fit right in with this group of phonies at city hall.
The cost for fuel, maintenance, and labor (2 operators) to efficiently operate this Vactor will, maybe, allow the city to recoup its purchase price in 12 to 15 years if at all. That is "IF" the Vactor does not require any substantial repairs over those 12 to 15 years, which it inevitably will. These aldermen and department heads are so damn uninformed it is actually embarrassing. They think they are going to run this truck "all the time", right? I can't wait to see how quickly this equipment gets torn up as a result of ruahing it into service without adequate training and a lack of understanding of how the equipment is supposed to be run and maintained. For instance, did anybody tell those knucklehead aldermen and the Super Chiefs how much time and labor it takes to "purge and winterize" every water line and reservoir on that truck every day in frezing temperatures? They have no clue what they are getting themselves into. Waldorf and Ferrari should get off their asses and put some time in lugging suction pipes and scraping shit and used condoms out of tanks every day for a month or so. Mark my words, this situation will result in hiring at least one if not two new employees either to run the Vactor or to fill the void in manpower created by the two existing employees who will be assigned to the Vactor. The Finance kid is being trained (indoctrinated) by Hylla in the speacialized art of Peru financial Hocus Pocus. Dollars and cents in Peru government are just as easy to manipulate as those no-nothing aldermen. What a scam!

Anonymous said...

@12:53 Have you seen the cover page of the 2015 calendar? When you picture yourself as a police state in a democracy you have to advertise calendars to get rid of them. Should of had General Putins picture placed in the center of the cover.

Anonymous said...

Anon 1:36 Had the same exact feeling upon 1st look at the cover page. Presently it appears that the Mayor is the No. 2 Man in Charge of Peru. Guess who is No. 1.

Anonymous said...

1;36 I do not want or need a calendar so please tell me what is on the cover.

Anonymous said...

Is it Bernie 4:01?

Anonymous said...

No, it's a large circle of police vehicles.

Anonymous said...

To vote against the purchase of a vactor truck may be the most selfish display of arrogance Perez has had. The truck unclogs those sewer problems. Remember the last few floods and the city had NO truck to ensure clean sewer lines, this was not acceptable. Those who understand the finances in Peru understand that the city can afford the purchase. I doubt Perez has any financial knowledge. The employees may not like the new duty, that's tough and if Perez is protecting that group he has a long way to go before he can effectively represent the North Peru area!

Anonymous said...

It should have waited the couple months and been put in budget ! Thank you Rodney for looking out for our money !

Anonymous said...

1:35 I guess you have some knowledge on the aspects of sucking sewage and I appreciate that. If the vactor is utilized in the proper fashion it will save the city money and prevent future problems, according to the city officilas and department heads. If your a city employee and resent the work detail, you have a choice to either hold the hose or collect the state check. Your job will have 200 applicants that are willing to work. Maybe, the city will not only contract out the grass cutting, they may contract out everything! be careful what you ask for. Those finance boys at city hall may come up with some more spreadsheets on cost savings.

Anonymous said...

Don't agree with Perez ' s vote on this purchase. But, my family will still be voting for him at the polls. Be smart enough to know that disagreeing with your alderman on one issue isn't an intelligent reason to stop supporting them. Alderman Perez, from a marketing standpoint, your signs should have been more colorful to stand out. I've noticed some have blended into landscaping. Thanks for all you do for our city.

Anonymous said...

9:10 PM....funny you mentioned Mr. Tom Payton. He has been at city council meetings and has attended finance meetings, special zoning meetings. He has been a leader in the Church Men's club and serves on the pension board. He has his own business in Peru. He will have signs up and will abide by city ordinance that allows election signs up 40 days in advance. I don't think he is the type that will disregard the local ordinance. Or paint his car with tacky election signs.

Anonymous said...

You must attend different council meetings with Payton , I see him there rarely . And the US Supreme court says cities can't set time limits on freedom of speech signs . Don't be a bully like the majority of the council . Rodney can do what he wants to his car and put his signs up whenever he wants just like any other person running . Or will you be like the Fire Department when Rodney ran last time , and they tried to forbid him to drive his personal vehicle with his sign on it to fire station for calls? This town is run by bullies that think they are the almighty one . Grow up and shut your mouth .

Anonymous said...

11:25 I think you must judge you vote on not one issue, but judge on the intelligence of those making the decision. And why they did?

Anonymous said...

11:45 gets your facts straight. It's not an ordinance violation to put signs up now. They can stay up all year round. Mr. Payton is not at council meetings as much as you say. If he was truly interested in being an alderman, he would attend every council meeting and stay til the end. Is he planning on picking and choosing which council meetings he will attend if he wins the election? He needs to know the issues.

Anonymous said...

Poof, is this like that new tanker truck for the fire department that was purchased whereas the city is responsible for the purchase price? Was this $700k expense needed? Didn't the department have a watering tanker truck that could have had some repairs at a minimal cost and saved taxpayers money? Our city's problem is that they are not fiscally responsible in decisi on makings, and could it be that our so called leaders aren't experienced enough to make common sense financial decisions? It's easy to vote yes or no, it's more work to ask questions. I don't think we have persons who are competent enough to make financial decisions. Just because a new piece of equipment looks new and is new, doesn't mean the expenses of it will pay for itself. Who cares about bragging rights? Our city officials can spend spend spend, but they can't run and hide. Too many people are aware of what's been going on over the past several years. Poof, a new vactor truck. Also, this is winter, why purchased at the time? Why wasn't it purchased late summer if I'm out of line with my common sense analogy, correct me.

Anonymous said...

11:45, there is no ordinance that prohibits when political signs can be displayed on private property. Your time to be outraged by that has come and gone - you should have complained several years ago when over restrictive ordinances forced the US Supreme Court to rule that all such restrictions where unconstitutional.
As far as being a member of the "Church Men's Club" goes - some people, including me, will count that as a negative.

1:42 - I believe the reasons behind purchasing the truck now where many - but cleaning sewers was not one of them. Perhaps the local company that manufactures the truck needed a revenue infusion during the slow time? Why this particular brand - there are others? Elections are on the horizon - perhaps certain Aldermen need to show that they are doing something besides paying lip service to the severe storm water draining problem faced by much of the city. Perhaps a favor was owed by someone to someone.
Time will tell how much use this truck gets.

Anonymous said...

1:20, 2:35 my figures come from on line minutes of committee meetings. And it looks like Mr.Payton has attended a few committee meetings. I must have missed Ald.Perez name on most of the public works and finance committee meetings attendance minutes?

2:35 Maybe your against buying locally, the truck is made in Streator and is used across the country. If your watching election cycles, I am not sure how you can make this purchase a negative one for those you want out of office. On the other hand when you home is flooded and your representative votes NO to potentially solve a problem, you must shake you head and try to understand why? The reports of city finances are very strong. Must be he is concerned about over worked employees?
I do agree with the supreme court, they do have authority over local laws. Even if Peru's law is 40 days, don't most candidates honor a local request?

Anonymous said...

3:30 what don't you understand about the sign ordinance? NO TIME RESTRICTIONS ON WHEN THEY CAN PUT UP OR FOR HOW LONG THEY CAN STAY UP. Do you get it now?

Anonymous said...

@ 3:30 you crack me up! Maybe if the committee meetings were held in the evenings, working folk could attend. Perez works and I'm pretty sure that's why those committee meetings were scheduled at those times when the new committees were formed - so Alderman Perez wouldn't be able to attend. Talk about a bunch of bullies!!

Anonymous said...

3:30 What minutes of what meetings are you referring to? I don't see Mr. Payton's name as having attended any recent committee meetings.

Anonymous said...

I'm reading these blogs and I had to laugh that a blogger mentioned "church men's club." Is this blogger on too many meds? I do not personally know the person who blogger was referencing to with their blog, wanted to get that straight. And what I'm blogging shouldn't be directed to any person. Blogger: do you watch tv, read, observe....? Just because a person is in a club doesn't necessarily mean they are of a higher caliber. Still laughing out loud. Because my aunt is a nun does that make she better then anybody else?

Anonymous said...

Oh 12:38, would love to know the conversation that took place with who involved regarding signage on Perez ' s vehicle when it was at the fire department. Does anybody see the circle in this equation? Add numbers together. Wonder if anybody is being played or has been played? Wonder if any back stabbing so to speak went on. This does happen sometimes to serve ones own gain. Be careful who you trust.

Anonymous said...

Perez works nights, he can make the meetings!

Anonymous said...

Give me a break 5:26 pm. Perez works early mornings to late afternoons. You are a liar.

Anonymous said...

3:30 PM, December 31, 2014 - because a product is made locally does not make it a better product. I'm not trying to bash the Streator company - stating that government should not make purchasing decisions based on where the product is manufactured.

Anonymous said...

As far as I'm concerned, if a candidate brags about being a member of the "Church Men's Club", it is an automatic disqualification to hold the office of Alderman.

Anonymous said...

7:41 It's tough to argue with stupid comments like the one you made.

Anonymous said...

3:15, the meaning of the post is obviously above you. Let me spell it out - If that is all he has in his CV worth bragging about, then maybe he doesn't have what it takes.

Anonymous said...

If you use that your in a men's club anywhere and try to get votes that way, sorry but you're a tool and a future follower and not a leader !

Anonymous said...

Although it is early in the election the question has to be asked. Has the Mayor and aldermen who personally and professionally dislike Alderman Perez persuaded the 3rd ward candidate to run or is he doing this on account of his own self motivation?
This is a important question and should be answered by Mr. Payton himself. Although Alderman Perez is the only city representative to personally utilize the blog to address his constituents I believe that all incumbents and candidates should feel the blog to be a informative tool of communication of their opinions and beliefs to the citizens and utilized as such.

Anonymous said...

4:52 Please help me. I'm stupid. What does CV mean?

Anonymous said...

9:04, Perez and Payton are running for the second ward.

9:33, I'm with you. What does CV mean?

Anonymous said...

CV stands for curriculum vitae, which means a brief account of your career. CVs are used to explain to recruiters what you can do and what you have done, so a good CV looks forwards as well as accounts for what you did in the past. It differs from a resume in that it is a much more detailed accounting of your experience, achievements, and vision. A resume should not exceed two pages. A CV has a minimum of two pages. CV's are generally used by experienced professionals.

Anonymous said...

@11:57
Peru politics gets confusing. Mainly because the 1st ward has a inefficient incumbent with no one running in opposition and the 3rd ward incumbents unfortunely represent themselves but do have a qualified candidate running against the famous "no-bid candidate" Walldorf.
In the recent ward redistricting did the thought evolve to possibly reduce the number of wards in Peru to 2, as the Mayor reduced the number of aldermen committees? Being that few worthy candidates are interested rather than reduce the number from 8 to 6, the number of aldermen would be reduced to 4,with 1/ward and 2 at large. This proposed council structure would provide Peru with a much more qualified council membership. See if you take a horse to water often enough he will eventually drink.