This blog is maintained for the sole purpose of allowing the people of Peru and those interested in the cities of the Illinois Valley to express their views.
“It doesn’t take a majority to win, just a tireless minority that will keep starting brush fires in the mind and hearts of their fellow men.”
Samuel Adams
Tuesday, February 14, 2012
Committee recommends accepting low bid for groundwater analysis
Fortunately for Peru taxpayers common sense prevailed at the Public Property Committee meeting last night. The committee made the only logiclal decision they could have by formally recommending to the full city council that the low bid from PDC Laboratories, Inc. be accepted. Leading up to the meeting there had been much speculation about the possibility of committee member Bob Ankiewicz attempting to obstruct the process of awarding the low bid in an effort to steer the contract to "high bidder" TEST, Inc. The difference between low bidder PDC and high bidder TEST was just shy of $17,000 per year. A group of TEST supporters consisting of at least two aldermen, including Ankiewicz, as well as one current and one former TEST employee had been considering tactics to discredit the bidding process as well as the low bidder in hopes of causing the contract to "default" back to TEST, Inc. Thankfully for the taxpayers of Peru, this group was clearly outmatched and overwhelmed by a professionally conducted and honest bidding process that will start saving the city money right away as it appears TEST has decided against performing what would have been it's final quarterly sampling event for the first quarter of 2012. The strategy of those who had hoped to corrupt the process of awarding the low bid appeared weak and primitive at best. Their intention was to "muddy the waters" or "groundwaters" if you will by trying to create the impression that the PDC bid was not as some like to say, Apples to Apples in comparison to what TEST has been providing for fifteen years. The groups focus was to use the committee meeting to cast doubt on the low bid by claiming that there might be additional "hidden" costs not apparent in the PDC bid. After all, Alderman Ankiewicz had been assured by TEST President Chris Perra that any other contractor would "never" be able to compete with TEST, Inc. Therefore, those other bidders must be trying to pull a fast one on the city of Peru. Upon hearing about the doubt being cast upon the low bid and low bidder, Clerk Bartley took the initiative to contact PDC in order to alert them that they may want to have a representative at the Public Property Committee meeting in order to address the rumors of "hidden costs". I also contacted PDC Laboratories late last week and urged them to send someone to speak at the committee. Last night, Gail Schindler, a Project Manager with PDC answered all questions and assured the committee that the bid they presented contains no hidden costs and that they stand by that bid as presented. Alderman Bob Ankiewicz was unable to provide any legitimate reason not to accept the PDC low bid and former TEST employee Kristy Mrowicki was unsuccessful in her attempts to suggest that PDC would charge the city more than their bid price. Mrowicki did verify that TEST's lab doesn't even perform much of the groundwater analysis at their Peru facility. It seems TEST actually "sub-contracts" a considerable amount of that work to other private laboratories throughout the midwest and as far awy as Ohio and Texas. I guess that explains why they have been charging the city so much for these services for all these years. Alderwoman Sherry Mayszak and Chamlin Engineer Mike Perry then agreed the low bid from PDC Labs was the best course of action for the city and suggested the committee recommend to the full council that the low bid be accepted. When Mayszak asked Ankiewicz if he concurred with that all I heard was a muffled grunt. I'm going to take that grunt as a yes. We are very fortunate in Peru these days that we have some elected officials who understand the importance of doing things the right way, and doing them in a professional manner as well. A special thanks to Alderwoman Mayszak for recognizing the importance of competitive bidding and pursuing this matter without being influenced by the status quo. Also, we need to thank Clerk Dave Bartley for preparing bid specifications and ensuring an open and honest bidding process.
I remain hopeful that we will continue to move forward on these and other issues.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
23 comments:
One contract down from TEST one to go!!
Steve
PDC is an untainted contractor scheduled to start potential business within the City of Peru and you are already tarnishing and engulfing their progress with lies and future revenue within other communities by trying to start a divide between their company and the residents who will ultimately determine their growth. Whether TEST or PDC, why are you so anti-business Steve?
Kristy Mrowicki
Good job Steve but I wonder why a citizen has to initiate these changes and not our elected officials from the mayor on down. The mayor doesn't even express how he feels about these changes. You must feel confident that the mayor agrees with the steps you're taking. Did he ask you to contact a rep from PDC?
So now what? The council still gets to vote on it?
The "sausage puller" (as mentioned in previous blogs) made a "muffled grunt?" You have made my day! Needed that laugh!!
Yes, thank you Mayszak for doing your job! If those in charge of compiling the specifications for the bid do their job properly, there should be no "apples to apples" questions to be made. Let progress begin!!!!
I say we put the public works department out for bids.
bartley finally did somethiing? now that is a shock, why do you have to do such name calling,it is so rude and senseless, really shows just how imature you are. is really sad.
The Clerk did not prepare anything...Chamlin was responsible for the process....thanks anyway Mr. Bartley
Can you ever allow something positive to occur Steve? For once everyone worked together to achieve a goal (the Clerks office, the council, the engineer, a resident) and utilized knowledge to seek guidance from an array of sources. Yet you consistently criticize business, officials, and private citizens when anyone attempts to assure the rest of us tax payers government is spending our $$ properly.
To 2:52 p.m. - To answer your questions about the mayor's position on this particular issue. Hers is the background as I understand it. Alderwoman Mayszak became aware of the lack of a contract for this work and proceeded to bring the issue up for discussion in the Public Property Committee. She immediately recieved resistance (as the meeting minutes clearly reflect) from Alderman Ankiewicz when the subject turned to competitive bidding with Ankiewicz eventually refusing Mayszak's requests that they bring the topic to the full council for consideration. Mayor Harl, according to those that witnessed the exchange, "strongly encouraged and eventually convinced" Bob Ankiewicz that he should let the full council decide if the work would be bid. That got the ball rolling and enabled the full council to do the right thing.
My decision to contact PDC Laboratories was my own. When it became clear to me that certain individuals were attempting to discredit the bidding process and the actual bid from PDC I knew that the Public Property Committee's review of the bids would be dominated by Ankiewicz and perhaps others in attendance in an effort to distort the facts and create doubt in the low bid in an attempt to preserve the work for TEST. With the PDC Project Manager in attendance to provide the facts, the accusations of "hidden costs" were quickly blown up.
To Kristy and 9:44 p.m. - I am far from "anti-business".
However, I will be extremely "anti-business" towards any company or contractor who is "shielded" from having to compete honestly for my tax money by certain elected officials in Peru. I will continue to criticize the corrupt policies of the past as well as those individuals, elected and otherwise, who continue to provide CPR to a sick and dying political tradition in Peru.
I would say that something "very positive" has just occurred 9:44 p.m.
http://www.ilga.gov/commission/lac/PurchasingLaws.pdf
Not sure how to make this appear as a link to click, but I would pay close attention to the sections on 1)Kickback, 2)Bid Rigging, and 3)Acquisition or Disclosure of Bidding Information by Public Officials. Read the sections very carefully and apply a few recent situations to the purchasing laws. Makes you want to laugh! Or maybe scream in disgust! I noticed the word F-E-L-O-N-Y mentioned many times! Someday, hopefully soon, somebody will hold our officials to the letter of this law. Respect the bidding process, it's the law! For your own protection!
Steve
People who are for true change and betterment of our community, district, etc. do not require an "ata boy". A true public servant many times serves without gratitude, accomplishes goals without acknowledgement and celebrates and/or suffers the joys and frustrations associated with their position in silence.
I agree with 9:44 The administration worked with those who had first hand working knowledge regarding this topic to achieve a common goal-to utilize the taxpayer dollars to the greatest benefit. Goal accomplished-hurray for the residents of Peru!
Please stop bashing TEST. Regardless of your personal feelings (I have my own) they are still a business in Peru who employee Peru residents who spends tax dollars in Peru and throughout Illinois.
The system worked: bid process, open meeting, public input, low bid to be awarded. What more are you seeking? A parade maybe...
Kristy
9:57AM
Kristy, you must remember that TEST has willingly participated in this for years but than again when you are "given" money it is not easy to say no. That extra money should have been spent in Peru where they received it.
Kristy - The "system" that you refer to "worked" becuase a few concerned citizens and elected officials, "MADE DAMN SURE" it would work by being vigilant and staying one step ahead of those who had hoped the system would "not" work. Just as it had been arranged "NOT" to work for the past fifteen years.
I'm not bashing TEST. The recent revelation of how much more costly than necessary it has been for the city to do business with TEST is a public relations problem that TEST has to deal with. Fact is, if TEST really did have the city's best financial interest in mind they would have stepped back and suggested the city use another laboratory. Instead, they kept cashing those checks.
Yes, a parade is in order. Thank you for suggesting it. Who does one contact when one wants a parade in this town anyway? Oh yes, perhaps you can volunteer to work with the "Recreation Director" ($9,900 per year) on a parade. How about a theme of "responsible and effective municipal government with an emphasis on common sense decisions"?
Honestly, who can blame Test? I'm neither for them nor against them, but they are a business just like a bakery or a gas station. Does anyone believe that it really costs $3.45 per gallon to purchase, refine, transport, and resell? But that's the going rate, and more importantly, that's what we as consumers are willing to pay for it. Test did the same thing. Since they had no competition, they had the ability to charge what they wanted. Kind of like the gas station in downtown LaSalle that is always $.20 higher than everyone else, you'll get some business, but eventually you have to bring down your prices or go under. I'm willing to bet, in the next round of bidding, Test will be much more competetive.
Steve I notice you decide not to publish my comment from yesterday? It's no different than the comment posted by 11:23 only mine was a bit more fiesty! Perhaps you are now anti-kristy :(
8:29PM
No not Steve, it was my decision based on my judgment at the time.
To Business Sense - You make good points. The important thing to remember here is that TEST will be allowed to compete in the future. That is the opportunity that was denied all others in the past.
Realistically though, it is doubtful that TEST will be capable of competing on a level playing field for this work as they are incapable of performing much of the analysis themselves. They have been sub-contracting the work to other labs across the country and that only drives up the cost for shipping and the percentage mark-up to ensure a profit for TEST.
Hmm a local company taking local dollars and paying an outside service - I don't consider gas and lab analysis the same thing...I wouldn't expect to take my car into a local mechanic to fix my car and he ship my car out for someone else to fix it but I have to pay him extra to cover that cost because he was not equipped to handle the work, "not my problem" comes to mind!
Speaking of gas, has anyone else noticed the gas smell from the landfill over the last 8-10 months? Wow tonight it was intoxicating and it seemed to linger, is the City still required to do gas monitoring because something has changed over the past several months to stir the fumes.
Kristy
10:40...why no9t ask TEST why they have to send the samples elsewhere. Have they ever said what they do for Peru and what someone else does?
8:56...I shouldn't have to ask TEST why they send out samples, they should tell us, and I have no clue what they do for Peru and I'm not really clear on what you mean by "what someone else does"? to whom are you referring to?
Post a Comment