Koehler upsets McFadden, Happy's owner wins in SV - LaSalle News Tribune - LaSalle, IL
Belated congratulations to our neighboring city of Spring Valley upon electing so many new faces to their city council.
Tuesday, April 28, 2015
Recreation Board is Political
I have had an interest in how the Peru Recreation Board is structured and whether they operate in the interests of the residents?
First and foremost this is a political entity, at least at the present time. I say that because the Mayor appoints members who are then automatically approved by the council. There have been times recently where people have volunteered and the mayor would not consider them because he considered them political opponents so even tho very qualified he will instead find someone who has not put his name in to be on the board and ask them if they will be a member. The term limit although written in an ordinance is not enforced and members continue on until they tire of being there.
From my observation, the rec bd, and Director Lynda Kasik are free to implement summer recreation activities including things like movies in the park, craft activities, tennis instruction, T ball etc. I do not know what the schedule is for this summer. Add the Halloween and Christmas parades and treats and yes the July 4 Fireworks.
With more oversight and direction plus following term limits if possible would help this board do a much better job and more encompassing of the entire community.
First and foremost this is a political entity, at least at the present time. I say that because the Mayor appoints members who are then automatically approved by the council. There have been times recently where people have volunteered and the mayor would not consider them because he considered them political opponents so even tho very qualified he will instead find someone who has not put his name in to be on the board and ask them if they will be a member. The term limit although written in an ordinance is not enforced and members continue on until they tire of being there.
From my observation, the rec bd, and Director Lynda Kasik are free to implement summer recreation activities including things like movies in the park, craft activities, tennis instruction, T ball etc. I do not know what the schedule is for this summer. Add the Halloween and Christmas parades and treats and yes the July 4 Fireworks.
With more oversight and direction plus following term limits if possible would help this board do a much better job and more encompassing of the entire community.
Sunday, April 26, 2015
Crib bumper bills bump heads in General Assembly
Crib bumper bills bump heads in General Assembly
in case you wondered, this is what you representatives are in a heated discussion about in Springfield. Just what Illinois needs another restriction. People will just order online or at a bordering state, please let people make their own personal decisions. Will they have to hire inspectors to come into the home of the child?
in case you wondered, this is what you representatives are in a heated discussion about in Springfield. Just what Illinois needs another restriction. People will just order online or at a bordering state, please let people make their own personal decisions. Will they have to hire inspectors to come into the home of the child?
Friday, April 24, 2015
Recreation Board Minutes Christmas at the Airport????
Some interesting ideas being thought about. Fourth of July on Water Street, Family Area.
Christmas display at the airport.
Christmas display at the airport.
Wednesday, April 22, 2015
Want to help clean up Spring Valley? - LaSalle News Tribune - LaSalle, IL
Want to help clean up Spring Valley? - LaSalle News Tribune - LaSalle, IL
Spring Valley another city working with volunteer residents. Good job Spring Valley.
Spring Valley another city working with volunteer residents. Good job Spring Valley.
Tuesday, April 21, 2015
La Salle annexation ruffles Peru's feathers - LaSalle News Tribune - LaSalle, IL
La Salle annexation ruffles Peru's feathers - LaSalle News Tribune - LaSalle, IL
But Peru is annexing a section of Bureau Cty for the sand facility, isn't it?
But Peru is annexing a section of Bureau Cty for the sand facility, isn't it?
Monday, April 20, 2015
More banners coming to downtown Peru - LaSalle News Tribune - LaSalle, IL
More banners coming to downtown Peru - LaSalle News Tribune - LaSalle, IL
HOW MUCH BUSINESS WILL THIS BRING TO DOWNTOWN PERU?
I know, do you?
HOW MUCH BUSINESS WILL THIS BRING TO DOWNTOWN PERU?
I know, do you?
Should Public Officials Be Protected from Criticism
This past rather shady election in Peru that took place on April 7, does not seem to go away. I have let it go because it is over. Those that ran and lost seem to have done so too but lots of locals are still upset about the involvement of the currently elected officials that took part in the election. True I have lost any respect I had for any of the officials who took to the streets or to the postal service to endorse their chosen candidates.
This morning I again received a post (not made public) about how evil I was because I allowed people to post anon about what they perceived as unfair and "dirty" politics during the elction season. I am evil because I allow people to express their feelings about Peru politics and publicly name the individuals they are disappointed in who are currently serving us in Peru. These are not rumors they are the truth and that is why you see them here. The lame excuses I have heard about why it was done are just that lame excuses.
Once you become an elected official, you are responsible to the public and not to your fellow officials with whom you have become friends. Some of you will take criticism for a long time and you surely knew that when you ran for office.
I was not personally responsible for the activities and decisions that have resulted in local chatter about you. I am sorry that some families will not let it go also but this is Peru politics.
I also believe in an informed electorate and that means not hiding facts of the election.
This morning I again received a post (not made public) about how evil I was because I allowed people to post anon about what they perceived as unfair and "dirty" politics during the elction season. I am evil because I allow people to express their feelings about Peru politics and publicly name the individuals they are disappointed in who are currently serving us in Peru. These are not rumors they are the truth and that is why you see them here. The lame excuses I have heard about why it was done are just that lame excuses.
Once you become an elected official, you are responsible to the public and not to your fellow officials with whom you have become friends. Some of you will take criticism for a long time and you surely knew that when you ran for office.
I was not personally responsible for the activities and decisions that have resulted in local chatter about you. I am sorry that some families will not let it go also but this is Peru politics.
I also believe in an informed electorate and that means not hiding facts of the election.
STATEHOUSE REEDER: It's wrong, no matter what you call it - The Times: Columnists
STATEHOUSE REEDER: It's wrong, no matter what you call it - The Times: Columnists
The best way to promote jobs in Illinois is to improve the business climate for all employers — not just a select few.
The best way to promote jobs in Illinois is to improve the business climate for all employers — not just a select few.
Saturday, April 18, 2015
The real scrooges in Springfield don't include Rauner
The real scrooges in Springfield don't include Rauner
ABOUT TIME SOMEONE WROTE THE TRUTH ABOUT THE STATE OF THE STATE
ABOUT TIME SOMEONE WROTE THE TRUTH ABOUT THE STATE OF THE STATE
Get into the game: Incubators aim to aid startups, boost job growth
Get into the game: Incubators aim to aid startups, boost job growth
IN PERU THIS COULD BE THE SOON TO BE VACANT WASHINGTON SCHOOL.
GREAT IDEAS TAKING PLACE IN OTTAWA AND STREATOR
THINKING OUTSIDE THE BOX
#startups
#streatorarmory
#starvedrock
IN PERU THIS COULD BE THE SOON TO BE VACANT WASHINGTON SCHOOL.
GREAT IDEAS TAKING PLACE IN OTTAWA AND STREATOR
THINKING OUTSIDE THE BOX
#startups
#streatorarmory
#starvedrock
Volunteer Week: Pitching in not just a one-day thing - LaSalle News Tribune - LaSalle, IL
Volunteer Week: Pitching in not just a one-day thing - LaSalle News Tribune - LaSalle, IL
THANK YOU NEWS TRIBUNE FOR THIS NICE ARTICLE. I LOVE WHEN THE COMMUNITY APPRECIATES VOLUNTEER EFFORTS AND GIVES THANKS FOR THEIR HELP. IT MAKES FOR A BETTER TOWN ALL AROUND.
THANK YOU NEWS TRIBUNE FOR THIS NICE ARTICLE. I LOVE WHEN THE COMMUNITY APPRECIATES VOLUNTEER EFFORTS AND GIVES THANKS FOR THEIR HELP. IT MAKES FOR A BETTER TOWN ALL AROUND.
Thursday, April 16, 2015
Legal Opinion on City Managerial Authority
The Municipal Code repeatedly stresses the distinction between policy and administration
in a manager form of government. The manager “shall be the administrative head of the
municipal government and … shall be responsible for the efficient administration of all
departments.” The manager is given substantial authority to control administration through the
power to hire and fire and authority over the documents that will lead to a budget or
appropriation ordinance. The Municipal Code also stresses the non-partisan nature of the
manager’s role: “He shall be appointed without regard to his political beliefs.” The emphasis is
consistently on the professional skill and managerial competence of the manager. Policy and
politics are the province of the council, not the manager. If the manager and the council
understand and respect these guiding principles and the statutory division of power, the manager
form of government can be a highly efficient and productive structure for a municipality. It has
so proven itself in dozens of Illinois municipalities.
LAW OFFICES ANCEL, GLINK, DIAMOND, BUSH, DICIANNI&KRAFTHEFER,
in a manager form of government. The manager “shall be the administrative head of the
municipal government and … shall be responsible for the efficient administration of all
departments.” The manager is given substantial authority to control administration through the
power to hire and fire and authority over the documents that will lead to a budget or
appropriation ordinance. The Municipal Code also stresses the non-partisan nature of the
manager’s role: “He shall be appointed without regard to his political beliefs.” The emphasis is
consistently on the professional skill and managerial competence of the manager. Policy and
politics are the province of the council, not the manager. If the manager and the council
understand and respect these guiding principles and the statutory division of power, the manager
form of government can be a highly efficient and productive structure for a municipality. It has
so proven itself in dozens of Illinois municipalities.
LAW OFFICES ANCEL, GLINK, DIAMOND, BUSH, DICIANNI&KRAFTHEFER,
Wanted: A county administrator
Wanted: A county administrator
BUREAU COUNTY WILL BY HIRING A COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR AND PERU DOES SHARE A BORDER WITH BUREAU CTY.
Princeton already has a City Manager and is the county seat of Bureau.
Regarding our local situation, yes it does appear that Doug Bernabei's name is at the top of the list to be City Administrator along with Police Chief, Peru Twp Trustee and seems to be the lead figure on the new proposed regional 911 Dispatch Center to be located in Oglesby.
BUREAU COUNTY WILL BY HIRING A COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR AND PERU DOES SHARE A BORDER WITH BUREAU CTY.
Princeton already has a City Manager and is the county seat of Bureau.
Regarding our local situation, yes it does appear that Doug Bernabei's name is at the top of the list to be City Administrator along with Police Chief, Peru Twp Trustee and seems to be the lead figure on the new proposed regional 911 Dispatch Center to be located in Oglesby.
Wednesday, April 15, 2015
.jpg)
TASK FORCE MEETING 4 PM AT PERU CITY HALL TODAY 4/15
I KNOW THIS IS LATE BUT BETTER LATE THAN NEVER. IF YOU ARE FREE AT THIS TIME AND INTERESTED IN THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR THAT MAYOR HARL WANTS, PLEASE COME.
Saturday, April 11, 2015
The Go Along to Get Along City
Sometime ago, I posted photos of a nasty structure in our neighbors rental unit that was illegally in place and poorly constructed with metal pieces unattached for a make shift roof back in October of 2014/. All commenters evidently thought this was funny and I should shut up and put up with it.
I had notified the proper authorities in the city by email 6 months ago to which they responded that they would check it out and they checked it out and end of story. I asked for help from my alderwoman representative and she said sure she would, end of story never heard back from her either.
So I knew that because i was not the go along get along type of person and the city had no one who had any backbone to ask that this illegal unpermitted structure be taken down I began to visualize the photo taken by someone from the city was sitting on the mayors desk and he enjoyed looking at it, knowing we were annoyed
So Mother Nature intervened and along with the helpful Peru Police Department it was taken care of according to the law which the people in charge should have taken care of and did not and you all can fill in the blanks here. The wind took it off and partially ended up on our property and just thankful it was not a window or a/c or even someone who was in our yard at the time being injured.
Many thanks to those that helped and we know that even though we have payed taxes for many years in this city, we are not entitled to have wrongs righted by the people who are supposed to be doing the zoning and permitting process, Mr King in Peru. So it is really the "go along to get along city". I also know that we are not alone and others have felt the sting of our elected officials who run this city.
I had notified the proper authorities in the city by email 6 months ago to which they responded that they would check it out and they checked it out and end of story. I asked for help from my alderwoman representative and she said sure she would, end of story never heard back from her either.
So I knew that because i was not the go along get along type of person and the city had no one who had any backbone to ask that this illegal unpermitted structure be taken down I began to visualize the photo taken by someone from the city was sitting on the mayors desk and he enjoyed looking at it, knowing we were annoyed
So Mother Nature intervened and along with the helpful Peru Police Department it was taken care of according to the law which the people in charge should have taken care of and did not and you all can fill in the blanks here. The wind took it off and partially ended up on our property and just thankful it was not a window or a/c or even someone who was in our yard at the time being injured.
Many thanks to those that helped and we know that even though we have payed taxes for many years in this city, we are not entitled to have wrongs righted by the people who are supposed to be doing the zoning and permitting process, Mr King in Peru. So it is really the "go along to get along city". I also know that we are not alone and others have felt the sting of our elected officials who run this city.
Friday, April 10, 2015
Good Government Bill Out of Committee
This bill is necessary for a variety of reasons. First and foremost, every budget that a unit of government passes, every contract it enters into and every meeting it holds is an act that taxpayers are financing and have a right to know about.
I posted the link to the article several days ago and today I am sharing just one of the elements of the bill. The one about "every meeting" strikes home here in Peru because of the huge number of executive sessions.
Will the rules regarding what comprises an executive session be changed and will the people who call these meetings be responsible for frequent reviews of past sessions and will the attorney continue to back them up to keep them out of the public light. In the 6 years that Harl has been in office, closed sessions have become common practice and only something like 6 have been released to the public.
Continue to keep an eye on House Bill 2717
http://ilga.gov/legislation/billstatus.asp?DocNum=2717&GAID=13&GA=99&DocTypeID=HB&LegID=88555&SessionID=88http://ilga.gov/legislation/billstatus.asp?DocNum=2717&GAID=13&GA=99&DocTypeID=HB&LegID=88555&SessionID=88
I posted the link to the article several days ago and today I am sharing just one of the elements of the bill. The one about "every meeting" strikes home here in Peru because of the huge number of executive sessions.
Will the rules regarding what comprises an executive session be changed and will the people who call these meetings be responsible for frequent reviews of past sessions and will the attorney continue to back them up to keep them out of the public light. In the 6 years that Harl has been in office, closed sessions have become common practice and only something like 6 have been released to the public.
Continue to keep an eye on House Bill 2717
http://ilga.gov/legislation/billstatus.asp?DocNum=2717&GAID=13&GA=99&DocTypeID=HB&LegID=88555&SessionID=88http://ilga.gov/legislation/billstatus.asp?DocNum=2717&GAID=13&GA=99&DocTypeID=HB&LegID=88555&SessionID=88
Thursday, April 09, 2015
There Was A Message From This Recent Election
Most of the Peru residents did get the message, at least those who actually took an interest in the campaign. Most residents turned a blind eye and deaf ear to all that was taking place.
I do not want to want to hear about the Peru haters, harpies or whatever you like to call those who actually watch Peru government. And contrary to what the current electeds like to tell people, we are an intelligent, well educated, well researched and up to date on all aspects of government group of people who have been proven right most of the time and few times not.
The At Large Election ia few years ago s a case in point where we had the most feared aspect of that in that all the elected would be from one area or ward of town. Currently by law we can have only 2 alderpeople per ward but wards abut one another and technically you could have 2 alderpeople on one side of the road and 2 on the other side and it would all be legal NOW, And as it is now Alderman Payton lives just east of Marquette and Alderman Radtke lives maybe 10 blocks away and Alderman Mueller of the First is just to the east on the other side of Marquette. All are east of 251 and north of Shooting Park Rd.
IMO, the odds of this happening with an at large group are remote because you would have a larger group of people to choose from because you would not be limited to 2 from a specific boundaried area.
Back to my original intent about what I learned from this election in which I participated in no way.
The message is "If you are honest, intelligent and interested in government and in the city as a whole and most importantly are an independent thinker who is sometimes willing to go against the stream, you are not welcome. You can do all the paper work and walk the streets but we will find a way to defeat you. And this year opposition candidates that were not pre approved by the council and mayor found out that they were not only running against the alderman whose term was up but were campaigned against by many of the current seated aldermen and a few others at city hall who were going door to door working for the current alderman and/or sending literature through the mail encouraging them to vote against the new candidate for the third ward aldermanic seat..
Although activity was not illegal it certainly sent a bad message to the community and surrounding area. So if being a part of city government is a goal for you and you live in Peru, make sure you are pre approved or find a different community to live in.
I do not want to want to hear about the Peru haters, harpies or whatever you like to call those who actually watch Peru government. And contrary to what the current electeds like to tell people, we are an intelligent, well educated, well researched and up to date on all aspects of government group of people who have been proven right most of the time and few times not.
The At Large Election ia few years ago s a case in point where we had the most feared aspect of that in that all the elected would be from one area or ward of town. Currently by law we can have only 2 alderpeople per ward but wards abut one another and technically you could have 2 alderpeople on one side of the road and 2 on the other side and it would all be legal NOW, And as it is now Alderman Payton lives just east of Marquette and Alderman Radtke lives maybe 10 blocks away and Alderman Mueller of the First is just to the east on the other side of Marquette. All are east of 251 and north of Shooting Park Rd.
IMO, the odds of this happening with an at large group are remote because you would have a larger group of people to choose from because you would not be limited to 2 from a specific boundaried area.
Back to my original intent about what I learned from this election in which I participated in no way.
The message is "If you are honest, intelligent and interested in government and in the city as a whole and most importantly are an independent thinker who is sometimes willing to go against the stream, you are not welcome. You can do all the paper work and walk the streets but we will find a way to defeat you. And this year opposition candidates that were not pre approved by the council and mayor found out that they were not only running against the alderman whose term was up but were campaigned against by many of the current seated aldermen and a few others at city hall who were going door to door working for the current alderman and/or sending literature through the mail encouraging them to vote against the new candidate for the third ward aldermanic seat..
Although activity was not illegal it certainly sent a bad message to the community and surrounding area. So if being a part of city government is a goal for you and you live in Peru, make sure you are pre approved or find a different community to live in.
Wednesday, April 08, 2015
Changing Demographics and Population in Illinois
FROM THE LIST OF COUNTIES, FIND LASALLE AND CHECK TO SEE HOW WE HAVE LOST POPULATION SINCE 1990.
Rauner: Illinois Supreme Court part of a 'corrupt system'
Rauner: Illinois Supreme Court part of a 'corrupt system'
STEP BY STEP TRYING TO CLEAN UP ILLINOIS POLITICS
STEP BY STEP TRYING TO CLEAN UP ILLINOIS POLITICS
Election is Over
No matter how you feel about the results of this city election, there is a very sad element to it also. Reading through the Ottawa Times election results, I found the statement that county wide only 21% of the voters took the opportunity to choose who will govern them for the next 4 years. So most people do not care who votes at city hall at least in La Salle County and I would not be surprised if the turnout was even lower in LaSalle Peru.
Not sure that the absentee ballots have been counted as of this hour but that figure may also include those ballots.
Most of the residents in the First Ward did not vote for the obvious reason as there was no city contest.
It is Wednesday morning and I have deleted numerous posts that keep referring to those the blog supported. I want to tell and if you already knew remind you that his blog did not support anyone for personal reasons therefore do not waste your time and mine by referring to the candidates this blog supported.
What we did support is right versus wrong and brought to light the wrong when it was done and there was enough of that and but evidently many people have trouble reading or are very forgiving of those who do wrong in order to win an election. We support the right of people to express their opinion in our local news without threatened intimidation and it is evident that many in Peru who voted believe that is OK.
Only 2 out of every 10 voting residents bothered to go to the polls, evidently the remaining 8 do not believe in participating in the electoral process. Not hard to visualize that the winning votes once again came from , family, neighbors,and relatives of those currently in office, of appointed officials, employees, city contractors. Add friends to the group also.
If you voted Thank You.
Not sure that the absentee ballots have been counted as of this hour but that figure may also include those ballots.
Most of the residents in the First Ward did not vote for the obvious reason as there was no city contest.
It is Wednesday morning and I have deleted numerous posts that keep referring to those the blog supported. I want to tell and if you already knew remind you that his blog did not support anyone for personal reasons therefore do not waste your time and mine by referring to the candidates this blog supported.
What we did support is right versus wrong and brought to light the wrong when it was done and there was enough of that and but evidently many people have trouble reading or are very forgiving of those who do wrong in order to win an election. We support the right of people to express their opinion in our local news without threatened intimidation and it is evident that many in Peru who voted believe that is OK.
Only 2 out of every 10 voting residents bothered to go to the polls, evidently the remaining 8 do not believe in participating in the electoral process. Not hard to visualize that the winning votes once again came from , family, neighbors,and relatives of those currently in office, of appointed officials, employees, city contractors. Add friends to the group also.
If you voted Thank You.
Tuesday, April 07, 2015
Your Day to Make a Decision for Peru................VOTE
If you are in a contested Peru city ward, get to the polls and VOTE. This is your city and tell them how you want to go forward or how you are happy with things now. It is your decision.
Monday, April 06, 2015
Saturday, April 04, 2015
RadioShack stores sold out of bankruptcy begin trek as new company
RadioShack stores sold out of bankruptcy begin trek as new company
Radio Shack has been bought out of bankruptcy, just posting for those who might be interested as it seems like they will continue to sell the same or similiar products both online and in stores in some places.
Radio Shack has been bought out of bankruptcy, just posting for those who might be interested as it seems like they will continue to sell the same or similiar products both online and in stores in some places.
Friday, April 03, 2015
Make a Choice, Infrastructure, Education, Parks, Tourism
"I want to see big boy/girl discussions on jobs, infrastructure, education, parks, tourism, etc. I understand the frustration that can occur when dealing with city hall, hence the old saying "you can't beat city hall," sent in as part of a blog post where the rest was directed to me"
I say again and again if you want those discussions then please start them and no one has brought forth a blog with details which are needed. That is not what I do, that is up to you.
I say again and again if you want those discussions then please start them and no one has brought forth a blog with details which are needed. That is not what I do, that is up to you.
Blue steel: Illinois’ manufacturing exodus continues
Blue steel: Illinois’ manufacturing exodus continues
THIRD STEEL COMPANY MOVING FROM ILLINOIS TO INDIANA
THIRD STEEL COMPANY MOVING FROM ILLINOIS TO INDIANA
Thursday, April 02, 2015
Wednesday, April 01, 2015
Personal Responsibility in Peru City Government
I am personally seeing that this election has brought out the true side of some of our officials and for some it was not the election but a gradually awareness of how they reacted to questions and finally how they responded to an ordinance they voted to create. Put the ordinance on the books and then when it came to personally following it, it was ignored.
The political sign ordinance is a prime example of how the city council functions. Never in a million years did the people who violated the ordinance a few weeks ago think that they would ever have to be concerned. They made sure the numbers and sizes were exactly as should be because they had to keep someone else in check, you know watch your opponents and forget that maybe it might affect you. The attorney drew up the ordinance and we paid him and evidently he thought everything was ok as it had been discussed for numerous meetings. Ald. Potthoff and Ald. Waldorf by their yes vote agreed that this ordinance was just what they wanted and all the others on the council agreed. In keeping their eye on everyone else and not their future plans for re election, I guess they thought that the ordinance did not apply to currently elected officials seeking re election.
Ald. Perez was initially in violation because his early sign was too big, he was told immediately by the zoning inspector and the size was changed right there and then.
My question is did Ald. P and Ald W deliberately ignore the ordinance and did the zoning officer give them a free pass?
What happened to personal responsibility? I do expect the people I vote for to take personal responsiblity for their actions because that is why we elect them and when they don't, it most certainly shows The last 2 Potthoff signs were actually removed by Zoning Inspector King just yesterday, not Ald. Potthoff.
Does it feel like we need to start fresh in this city?,
Beginning of correspondence re: illegal political signage to the zoning inspector.
To: Dave Bartley, Stephanie Piscia
Subject: Political sign ordinance violation FOIA
Hi Dave and Stephanie,
I'd like any and all correspondence from any city official to any Peru political candidate about political sign ordinance violations beginning January 1, 2015.
Thank you!
Sherry
Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2015 10:21 AM
To: Dave Bartley; Stephanie Piscia
Subject: Fwd: Political sign ordinance violation FOIA
Hi Dave & Stephanie,
I just want to clarify that I want all correspondence about political sign violations from or to elected or appointed officials. I wasn't sure that was clear after I sent the first email.
Thanks!
> Subject: RE: Political sign ordinance violation FOIA
>
> Hi Sherry,
>
>
> Here is the information you requested.
>
>
>
> Stephanie
On Mar 25, 2015, at 10:37 PM, Sherry wrote:
> Jeff,
>
> I received the emails I requested thru a FOIA regarding the political sign violations. You emailed Dave Potthoff on Monday, March 16 and I'm wondering if you got a response from him? There is no email response from him. Is the city just going to let this violation from one of our city leaders slide?
>
> I would also like to know why Alderman Waldorf was not sent an email saying he was in violation of the ordinance by having two signs in at least 3 yards.
>
> Thank you,
On Mar 25, 2015, at 10:57 PM, Jeff King wrote:
> Sherry as it is right now all the candidates are in violation of some parts of the ordinance. Whether it is a sign to big, to many signs or most of all public right of way violations. Dave has not responded to me plus no one has filed a compliant against Mr. Waldorf to date with me.
> Jeff
> Subject: Re: Political sign ordinance violation FOIA
>
> Jeff,
>
> Saying everybody is in violation is ridiculous and I'm very disappointed in how this city shows favoritism to some aldermen.
>
> Consider this a complaint about Waldorf's signs and please notify him that he is in violation.
>
> Blatant disregard of the ordinance is wrong on so many levels. I cannot believe this is being allowed to continue.
>
> Sherry
To: psm@peru.il.us, admin@peru.il.us, Scott Harl,
> Subject: Signs
>
> Jeff,
>
> I'd like the home owners who have 2 Waldorf signs, 2 Potthoff signs and Potthoff signs that are oversized notified that they are in violation of the city ordinance regarding campaign signs.
>
> I distinctly remember before this ordinance was approved discussing how right of ways would be hard to enforce because in some areas of town, the right of way is in the middle of people's front yards.
>
> But blatant violations need to be addressed and acted on.
>
> Thank you,
Jeff,
If you are not engaging in selective enforcement, then why did Rodney get orders to remove his sign at SPR & 251, and the email you sent Potthoff asked for his thoughts? He should have been told to come into compliance just like Rodney was.
Sherry
> Sherry:
>
> I will forward your email complaint to Dave Waldorf informing him of your
> complaint. This is how I have handled other complaints regarding campaign
> signs. I will point out it appears that every single candidate in a
> contested race within the city appears to have some violation taking place
> with their campaign signs. This appears to be the case not only here in Peru
> but also every single community I have recently visited.
> The most common widespread violation is signs on the public right of way. As
> you can imagine enforcing this would be time intensive and cost prohibitive
> to verify exact locations of right of way as that varies throughout the city
> based on the age of the subdivision and many other factors. We only have
> taken action if I determine that the sign is obstructing a view and poses a
> public safety risk. Otherwise, it is to each candidate to do their best to
> comply with ordinances and regulations.
> I do forward on specific complaints received and have done so on right of
> way, size, and number complaints. I will not however engage in selective
> enforcement, i.e. I will not enforce only certain violations against certain
> candidates, which is what it appears, you are suggesting. To do so would
> open up myself and the city to allegations of selective prosecution, which
> is something I simply will not do.
> I wish to also remind you that the ordinance, like many across the country
> is a fluid document and subject to change based on decisions of both state
> and federal courts with certainly constitutional issues. For that reason, it
> is especially incumbent on me to insure equal enforcement and to apply
> common sense and judgment.
> While you may disagree with this approach, I nonetheless reiterate that I
> will not engage in something that arguably could be selective enforcement of
> a personal nature, which in itself could be a constitutional violation.
>
> Jeff
> -----
> From: Sherry
> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2015 6:13 AM
> To: psm@peru.il.us; admin@peru.il.us; Scott Harl; Rodney Perez
> Subject: Signs
>
> Jeff,
>
> I'd like the home owners who have 2 Waldorf signs, 2 Potthoff signs and
> Potthoff signs that are oversized notified that they are in violation of the
> city ordinance regarding campaign signs.
>
> I distinctly remember before this ordinance was approved discussing how
> right of ways would be hard to enforce because in some areas of town, the
> right of way is in the middle of people's front yards.
>
> But blatant violations need to be addressed and acted on.
>
> Thank you,
> Sherry M
Thursday, March 26, 2015 2:01 PM
To: Rodney Perez; psm@peru.il.us; Scott Harl; admin@peru.il.us
Subject: Fwd: Signs
Jeff,
I expect you to take the same action with Potthoff and Waldorf that you took with Perez. If you re-read your email about the Perez and Payton signs, at the end of that email it states in bold "the city is requesting Perez to remove it from the right of way and reduce its size". To be sure you're not engaging in selective enforcement, I would think you'd want to make sure you fairly gave notice to all concerned. My next step will be contacting the Attorney General for unfair enforcement of codes and favoritism.
Sherry M
Begin forwarded message:
From: Sherry M
Date: March 26, 2015 at 1:14:12 PM CDT
To: Scott Harl, Rodney Perez , psm@peru.il.us, admin@peru.il.us
Subject: Fwd: Signs
Sent from my iPhone
Begin forwarded message:
From: Sherry M
Date: March 26, 2015 at 1:11:35 PM CDT
To: Jeff King
Subject: Re: Signs
Jeff,
If you are not engaging in selective enforcement, then why did Rodney get orders to remove his sign at SPR & 251, and the email you sent Potthoff asked for his thoughts? He should have been told to come into compliance just like Rodney was.
Sherry
On Mar 26, 2015, at 8:45 AM, Jeff King wrote:
Sherry:
I will forward your email complaint to Dave Waldorf informing him of your
complaint. This is how I have handled other complaints regarding campaign
signs. I will point out it appears that every single candidate in a
contested race within the city appears to have some violation taking place
with their campaign signs. This appears to be the case not only here in Peru
but also every single community I have recently visited.
The most common widespread violation is signs on the public right of way. As
you can imagine enforcing this would be time intensive and cost prohibitive
to verify exact locations of right of way as that varies throughout the city
based on the age of the subdivision and many other factors. We only have
taken action if I determine that the sign is obstructing a view and poses a
public safety risk. Otherwise, it is to each candidate to do their best to
comply with ordinances and regulations.
I do forward on specific complaints received and have done so on right of
way, size, and number complaints. I will not however engage in selective
enforcement, i.e. I will not enforce only certain violations against certain
candidates, which is what it appears, you are suggesting. To do so would
open up myself and the city to allegations of selective prosecution, which
is something I simply will not do.
I wish to also remind you that the ordinance, like many across the country
is a fluid document and subject to change based on decisions of both state
and federal courts with certainly constitutional issues. For that reason, it
is especially incumbent on me to insure equal enforcement and to apply
common sense and judgment.
While you may disagree with this approach, I nonetheless reiterate that I
will not engage in something that arguably could be selective enforcement of
a personal nature, which in itself could be a constitutional violation.
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: Sherry M
Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2015 6:13 AM
To: psm@peru.il.us; admin@peru.il.us; Scott Harl; Rodney Perez
Subject: Signs
Jeff,
I'd like the home owners who have 2 Waldorf signs, 2 Potthoff signs and
Potthoff signs that are oversized notified that they are in violation of the
city ordinance regarding campaign signs.
I distinctly remember before this ordinance was approved discussing how
right of ways would be hard to enforce because in some areas of town, the
right of way is in the middle of people's front yards.
But blatant violations need to be addressed and acted on.
Thank you,
Sherry M
> Date: March 30, 2015 at 7:54:36 AM CDT
> To: Jeff King, admin@peru.il.us
> Subject: Potthoff's illegal campaign signs
>
> Hi Jeff,
>
> Thank you for addressing the campaign sign ordinance violations. It appears all have complied except for 2 places that still have 2 Potthoff signs in one yard. They are located at the corner of 4th and Harrison and the corner of 5th and Herbert. I think it's now time for you to remove one sign from each of those properties since Potthoff has not.
>
> Thank you,
> Sherry M
> Date: March 30, 2015 at 7:54:36 AM CDT
> To: Jeff King, admin@peru.il.us
> Subject: Potthoff's illegal campaign signs
>
> Hi Jeff,
>
> Thank you for addressing the campaign sign ordinance violations. It appears all have complied except for 2 places that still have 2 Potthoff signs in one yard. They are located at the corner of 4th and Harrison and the corner of 5th and Herbert. I think it's now time for you to remove one sign from each of those properties since Potthoff has not.
>
> Thank you,
> Sherry M
> To: Jeff King
> Cc: "" , Mayor Harl-work , Dave Bartley , Dave , Tony Ferrari , Dave Waldorf , "" , "" , Rodney Perez , Alderman Mike Radtke , Becky Mueller , Mike Sapienza , "" , "" , "" , ""
> Subject: Re: Signs
>
> Jeff,
>
> Thank you for making sure Alderman's Potthoff's signs are in compliance. My point about the 3 signs at SPR and Peoria Street is the maximum square footage allowed at any residence is 32 sq feet. When Alderman Potthoff added his sign there, it exceeded the limit.
>
> The right of way should be enforced. I'm not suggesting that you not enforce it, but I don't know where right of ways extend. You are the one who said that would be time prohibitive.
>
> I pleaded with you to correct it, twice. I could have just posted it on Facebook and the blog and not given you a chance to correct it.
>
> Unfortunately I had to plead and threaten in order to get a few aldermen to comply with an ordinance.
>
> Sherry M
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Mar 31, 2015, at 10:02 AM, Jeff King wrote:
>>
>> Dear Ms. Mayszak, I have personally measured Mr. Potthoffs sign at Peoria
>> and SPR and it is exactly 16 square feet. This is not in violation of the
>> current sign ordinance. I'm not sure why you continue to say that is it is.
>> As for the other properties with 2 signs they are currently in compliance.
>> Again I will repeat what I have currently responded to you, all candidates
>> are in violation of the current sign ordinance and you now you are telling
>> me to ignore any right away violation but enforce only what you want out of
>> the ordinance. What is the difference between a right of way violation vs. 2
>> signs in a yard, or 16 square feet. This is called select enforcement in
>> which you yourself are accusing me of. Everything you have asked has been
>> addressed if you choose to continue to threaten me then so be it.
>>
>>
>> Jeff King
>> Public services Manager
>> City of Peru
>> 1-815-223-1148
>> 1-815-712-2165 cell
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Sherry M
>> Sent: Monday, March 30, 2015 8:53 PM
>> To: Jeff King
>> Cc: admin@peru.il.us
>> Subject: Signs
>>
>> Jeff,
>>
>> I drove past the illegal signs after I got off work at 8:00 tonight. I'm sad
>> to see them still in place. Please remove one from each property and replace
>> the one at Peoria & SPR with a smaller one. I'm begging you to do this
>> because if they aren't corrected, I told Lois she could post those emails on
>> the blog and on the blog's Facebook page. In my opinion those emails look
>> like you are favoring Potthoff over Rodney, and the blog will have a field
>> day. I honestly do not want that to happen. I'm copying Doug on this so
>> hopefully he will persuade you to either make Potthoff comply or do it
>> yourself.
>>
>> I told her today was the deadline, but I'm extending it until 1:00 tomorrow
>> afternoon.
>>
>> You can hate me all you want, but what's fair is fair and Potthoff isn't
>> playing fair.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Sherry
>
>
The political sign ordinance is a prime example of how the city council functions. Never in a million years did the people who violated the ordinance a few weeks ago think that they would ever have to be concerned. They made sure the numbers and sizes were exactly as should be because they had to keep someone else in check, you know watch your opponents and forget that maybe it might affect you. The attorney drew up the ordinance and we paid him and evidently he thought everything was ok as it had been discussed for numerous meetings. Ald. Potthoff and Ald. Waldorf by their yes vote agreed that this ordinance was just what they wanted and all the others on the council agreed. In keeping their eye on everyone else and not their future plans for re election, I guess they thought that the ordinance did not apply to currently elected officials seeking re election.
Ald. Perez was initially in violation because his early sign was too big, he was told immediately by the zoning inspector and the size was changed right there and then.
My question is did Ald. P and Ald W deliberately ignore the ordinance and did the zoning officer give them a free pass?
What happened to personal responsibility? I do expect the people I vote for to take personal responsiblity for their actions because that is why we elect them and when they don't, it most certainly shows The last 2 Potthoff signs were actually removed by Zoning Inspector King just yesterday, not Ald. Potthoff.
Does it feel like we need to start fresh in this city?
Beginning of correspondence re: illegal political signage to the zoning inspector.
To: Dave Bartley
Subject: Political sign ordinance violation FOIA
Hi Dave and Stephanie,
I'd like any and all correspondence from any city official to any Peru political candidate about political sign ordinance violations beginning January 1, 2015.
Thank you!
Sherry
Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2015 10:21 AM
To: Dave Bartley; Stephanie Piscia
Subject: Fwd: Political sign ordinance violation FOIA
Hi Dave & Stephanie,
I just want to clarify that I want all correspondence about political sign violations from or to elected or appointed officials. I wasn't sure that was clear after I sent the first email.
Thanks!
> Subject: RE: Political sign ordinance violation FOIA
>
> Hi Sherry,
>
>
> Here is the information you requested.
>
>
>
> Stephanie
On Mar 25, 2015, at 10:37 PM, Sherry wrote:
> Jeff,
>
> I received the emails I requested thru a FOIA regarding the political sign violations. You emailed Dave Potthoff on Monday, March 16 and I'm wondering if you got a response from him? There is no email response from him. Is the city just going to let this violation from one of our city leaders slide?
>
> I would also like to know why Alderman Waldorf was not sent an email saying he was in violation of the ordinance by having two signs in at least 3 yards.
>
> Thank you,
On Mar 25, 2015, at 10:57 PM, Jeff King
> Sherry as it is right now all the candidates are in violation of some parts of the ordinance. Whether it is a sign to big, to many signs or most of all public right of way violations. Dave has not responded to me plus no one has filed a compliant against Mr. Waldorf to date with me.
> Jeff
> Subject: Re: Political sign ordinance violation FOIA
>
> Jeff,
>
> Saying everybody is in violation is ridiculous and I'm very disappointed in how this city shows favoritism to some aldermen.
>
> Consider this a complaint about Waldorf's signs and please notify him that he is in violation.
>
> Blatant disregard of the ordinance is wrong on so many levels. I cannot believe this is being allowed to continue.
>
> Sherry
To: psm@peru.il.us, admin@peru.il.us, Scott Harl
> Subject: Signs
>
> Jeff,
>
> I'd like the home owners who have 2 Waldorf signs, 2 Potthoff signs and Potthoff signs that are oversized notified that they are in violation of the city ordinance regarding campaign signs.
>
> I distinctly remember before this ordinance was approved discussing how right of ways would be hard to enforce because in some areas of town, the right of way is in the middle of people's front yards.
>
> But blatant violations need to be addressed and acted on.
>
> Thank you,
Jeff,
If you are not engaging in selective enforcement, then why did Rodney get orders to remove his sign at SPR & 251, and the email you sent Potthoff asked for his thoughts? He should have been told to come into compliance just like Rodney was.
Sherry
> Sherry:
>
> I will forward your email complaint to Dave Waldorf informing him of your
> complaint. This is how I have handled other complaints regarding campaign
> signs. I will point out it appears that every single candidate in a
> contested race within the city appears to have some violation taking place
> with their campaign signs. This appears to be the case not only here in Peru
> but also every single community I have recently visited.
> The most common widespread violation is signs on the public right of way. As
> you can imagine enforcing this would be time intensive and cost prohibitive
> to verify exact locations of right of way as that varies throughout the city
> based on the age of the subdivision and many other factors. We only have
> taken action if I determine that the sign is obstructing a view and poses a
> public safety risk. Otherwise, it is to each candidate to do their best to
> comply with ordinances and regulations.
> I do forward on specific complaints received and have done so on right of
> way, size, and number complaints. I will not however engage in selective
> enforcement, i.e. I will not enforce only certain violations against certain
> candidates, which is what it appears, you are suggesting. To do so would
> open up myself and the city to allegations of selective prosecution, which
> is something I simply will not do.
> I wish to also remind you that the ordinance, like many across the country
> is a fluid document and subject to change based on decisions of both state
> and federal courts with certainly constitutional issues. For that reason, it
> is especially incumbent on me to insure equal enforcement and to apply
> common sense and judgment.
> While you may disagree with this approach, I nonetheless reiterate that I
> will not engage in something that arguably could be selective enforcement of
> a personal nature, which in itself could be a constitutional violation.
>
> Jeff
> -----
> From: Sherry
> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2015 6:13 AM
> To: psm@peru.il.us; admin@peru.il.us; Scott Harl; Rodney Perez
> Subject: Signs
>
> Jeff,
>
> I'd like the home owners who have 2 Waldorf signs, 2 Potthoff signs and
> Potthoff signs that are oversized notified that they are in violation of the
> city ordinance regarding campaign signs.
>
> I distinctly remember before this ordinance was approved discussing how
> right of ways would be hard to enforce because in some areas of town, the
> right of way is in the middle of people's front yards.
>
> But blatant violations need to be addressed and acted on.
>
> Thank you,
> Sherry M
Thursday, March 26, 2015 2:01 PM
To: Rodney Perez; psm@peru.il.us; Scott Harl; admin@peru.il.us
Subject: Fwd: Signs
Jeff,
I expect you to take the same action with Potthoff and Waldorf that you took with Perez. If you re-read your email about the Perez and Payton signs, at the end of that email it states in bold "the city is requesting Perez to remove it from the right of way and reduce its size". To be sure you're not engaging in selective enforcement, I would think you'd want to make sure you fairly gave notice to all concerned. My next step will be contacting the Attorney General for unfair enforcement of codes and favoritism.
Sherry M
Begin forwarded message:
From: Sherry M
Date: March 26, 2015 at 1:14:12 PM CDT
To: Scott Harl
Subject: Fwd: Signs
Sent from my iPhone
Begin forwarded message:
From: Sherry M
Date: March 26, 2015 at 1:11:35 PM CDT
To: Jeff King
Subject: Re: Signs
Jeff,
If you are not engaging in selective enforcement, then why did Rodney get orders to remove his sign at SPR & 251, and the email you sent Potthoff asked for his thoughts? He should have been told to come into compliance just like Rodney was.
Sherry
On Mar 26, 2015, at 8:45 AM, Jeff King
Sherry:
I will forward your email complaint to Dave Waldorf informing him of your
complaint. This is how I have handled other complaints regarding campaign
signs. I will point out it appears that every single candidate in a
contested race within the city appears to have some violation taking place
with their campaign signs. This appears to be the case not only here in Peru
but also every single community I have recently visited.
The most common widespread violation is signs on the public right of way. As
you can imagine enforcing this would be time intensive and cost prohibitive
to verify exact locations of right of way as that varies throughout the city
based on the age of the subdivision and many other factors. We only have
taken action if I determine that the sign is obstructing a view and poses a
public safety risk. Otherwise, it is to each candidate to do their best to
comply with ordinances and regulations.
I do forward on specific complaints received and have done so on right of
way, size, and number complaints. I will not however engage in selective
enforcement, i.e. I will not enforce only certain violations against certain
candidates, which is what it appears, you are suggesting. To do so would
open up myself and the city to allegations of selective prosecution, which
is something I simply will not do.
I wish to also remind you that the ordinance, like many across the country
is a fluid document and subject to change based on decisions of both state
and federal courts with certainly constitutional issues. For that reason, it
is especially incumbent on me to insure equal enforcement and to apply
common sense and judgment.
While you may disagree with this approach, I nonetheless reiterate that I
will not engage in something that arguably could be selective enforcement of
a personal nature, which in itself could be a constitutional violation.
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: Sherry M
Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2015 6:13 AM
To: psm@peru.il.us; admin@peru.il.us; Scott Harl; Rodney Perez
Subject: Signs
Jeff,
I'd like the home owners who have 2 Waldorf signs, 2 Potthoff signs and
Potthoff signs that are oversized notified that they are in violation of the
city ordinance regarding campaign signs.
I distinctly remember before this ordinance was approved discussing how
right of ways would be hard to enforce because in some areas of town, the
right of way is in the middle of people's front yards.
But blatant violations need to be addressed and acted on.
Thank you,
Sherry M
> Date: March 30, 2015 at 7:54:36 AM CDT
> To: Jeff King
> Subject: Potthoff's illegal campaign signs
>
> Hi Jeff,
>
> Thank you for addressing the campaign sign ordinance violations. It appears all have complied except for 2 places that still have 2 Potthoff signs in one yard. They are located at the corner of 4th and Harrison and the corner of 5th and Herbert. I think it's now time for you to remove one sign from each of those properties since Potthoff has not.
>
> Thank you,
> Sherry M
> Date: March 30, 2015 at 7:54:36 AM CDT
> To: Jeff King
> Subject: Potthoff's illegal campaign signs
>
> Hi Jeff,
>
> Thank you for addressing the campaign sign ordinance violations. It appears all have complied except for 2 places that still have 2 Potthoff signs in one yard. They are located at the corner of 4th and Harrison and the corner of 5th and Herbert. I think it's now time for you to remove one sign from each of those properties since Potthoff has not.
>
> Thank you,
> Sherry M
> To: Jeff King
> Cc: "
> Subject: Re: Signs
>
> Jeff,
>
> Thank you for making sure Alderman's Potthoff's signs are in compliance. My point about the 3 signs at SPR and Peoria Street is the maximum square footage allowed at any residence is 32 sq feet. When Alderman Potthoff added his sign there, it exceeded the limit.
>
> The right of way should be enforced. I'm not suggesting that you not enforce it, but I don't know where right of ways extend. You are the one who said that would be time prohibitive.
>
> I pleaded with you to correct it, twice. I could have just posted it on Facebook and the blog and not given you a chance to correct it.
>
> Unfortunately I had to plead and threaten in order to get a few aldermen to comply with an ordinance.
>
> Sherry M
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Mar 31, 2015, at 10:02 AM, Jeff King
>>
>> Dear Ms. Mayszak, I have personally measured Mr. Potthoffs sign at Peoria
>> and SPR and it is exactly 16 square feet. This is not in violation of the
>> current sign ordinance. I'm not sure why you continue to say that is it is.
>> As for the other properties with 2 signs they are currently in compliance.
>> Again I will repeat what I have currently responded to you, all candidates
>> are in violation of the current sign ordinance and you now you are telling
>> me to ignore any right away violation but enforce only what you want out of
>> the ordinance. What is the difference between a right of way violation vs. 2
>> signs in a yard, or 16 square feet. This is called select enforcement in
>> which you yourself are accusing me of. Everything you have asked has been
>> addressed if you choose to continue to threaten me then so be it.
>>
>>
>> Jeff King
>> Public services Manager
>> City of Peru
>> 1-815-223-1148
>> 1-815-712-2165 cell
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Sherry M
>> Sent: Monday, March 30, 2015 8:53 PM
>> To: Jeff King
>> Cc: admin@peru.il.us
>> Subject: Signs
>>
>> Jeff,
>>
>> I drove past the illegal signs after I got off work at 8:00 tonight. I'm sad
>> to see them still in place. Please remove one from each property and replace
>> the one at Peoria & SPR with a smaller one. I'm begging you to do this
>> because if they aren't corrected, I told Lois she could post those emails on
>> the blog and on the blog's Facebook page. In my opinion those emails look
>> like you are favoring Potthoff over Rodney, and the blog will have a field
>> day. I honestly do not want that to happen. I'm copying Doug on this so
>> hopefully he will persuade you to either make Potthoff comply or do it
>> yourself.
>>
>> I told her today was the deadline, but I'm extending it until 1:00 tomorrow
>> afternoon.
>>
>> You can hate me all you want, but what's fair is fair and Potthoff isn't
>> playing fair.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Sherry
>
>
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)